2010 Year in Review: Exchanges Balance Regulatory, Policy Changes
European exchanges unbundled real-time access to post-trade data in 2010 in a bid to avoid the European Commission imposing a mandated consolidated tape as part its MiFID review, while adopting new data policies to drive other revenues from their data businesses.
The debate over the consolidated tape began with the Committee of European Securities Regulators’ (CESR) May consultation paper, which suggested a mandated tape of European equity data to improve the quality and reduce the cost of pan-European data collection (IMD, May 28).
Data providers argued that these goals could be achieved by other means, while the Federation of European Securities Exchanges (FESE) committed to unbundle real-time trade data, help promote standardization of trade identifiers and make delayed data available for free (IMD, July 12), and the London Stock Exchange—one of the only European exchanges that is not part of FESE—announced similar plans (IMD, July 19).
In response, CESR recommended that the market should have an opportunity to provide an industry-led option prior to any mandated solution (IMD, Aug. 2). To help achieve this, an industry working group set out standards to address trade data quality via common trade identifiers and rules to clarify who is responsible for reporting trades (IMD, Oct. 18). Most recently, the European Commission published its consultation paper on MiFID 2, including the option of an industry-led set of consolidated tapes using common standards and run by vendors, or a mandated, utility-style solution (IMD, Dec. 13).
Matters of Policy
But at the same time that exchanges unbundled their post-trade data, they were also changing their data administration and commercial policies to stimulate data revenues in other areas.
The London Stock Exchange began a direct billing and reporting initiative that enables multi-vendor netting to ensure that users only pay once for the same data viewed via multiple vendor displays and infrastructures, and announced UBS as its first client, while also introducing a new license targeting firms that use the exchange’s real-time data in non-display applications (IMD, Nov. 29).
Nasdaq OMX introduced a similar license for non-display use of its TotalView and PHLX feeds in the US (IMD, June 7), and also increased the price of its Nordic data products, but ended up delaying the price rise in response to user feedback (IMD, Aug. 23).
Meanwhile, the SIX Swiss Exchange put the squeeze on its multilateral trading facility rivals by proposing a new data policy to specifically target MTFs that use its data (IMD, Oct. 18), while NYSE Euronext changed commercial terms for viewers of its Liffe derivatives data by cutting costs for Level 2 accesses, and raising them for Level 1 data (IMD, Aug. 16).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.