'40 Act Compliance in Focus as Funds Introduce New Liquid Alts
Flexible reporting tools required as regulators consider further oversight.
Liquid alternatives — new post-crisis products meant to package risk into traditional structures like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and mutual funds — are very much on the rise.
According to data from Vanguard, fully half of liquid alts' $449 billion in assets have been invested since 2013, as more investors chase alternatives-level returns without the requirement of qualified investment.
Some of these offerings have come from familiar giants, Vanguard included, but a sizeable chunk has also developed among buy-side shops with little — sometimes zero — previous exposure to public markets.
Among these is Larch Lane Advisors, a Rye Brook, N.Y.-based asset management shop that has long focused on fund-of-fund and early-stage hedge fund seeding, but in 2014 partnered with Rothschild Asset Management on a joint venture, creating its first SEC-registered mutual fund last July.
"Up until last year we operated in the private world, but around two years ago we started to recognize that there were significant flows coming from retail investors into the mutual fund space and new parties that were developing these funds," David Katz, Larch Lane's COO, tells Buy-Side Technology. "So we began to think about the potential ability to create a product that would be unique to the market, using decades of investing expertise and then parlaying that experience into a liquid product that could be constructed in a mutual fund format. We knew Rothschild was thinking about liquid alts similar to the way we were — they run liquid portfolios in Europe and we have run liquid portfolios in the US — and so it became clear that there were synergies."
In dealing with '40 Act, we are monitoring regulatory rules daily, including limits around diversification, commodity income, position concentration, liquidity, and leverage, to name a few. Many of the rules in place require us to address potential issues immediately. - Eric Konigsberg, CRO at Larch Lane Advisors
Quicker to React
The two firms now have several joint committees governing the '40 Act offering, including management, investment, compliance, and risk. But Katz says "the most important thing," tasked to chief risk officer Eric Konigsberg, was developing an additional risk monitoring platform to handle the regulatory limits implied by '40 Act rules.
After an exhaustive search, Imagine Software was selected behind their willingness to customize a solution. "There was no off-the-shelf product that was perfect, and they had the experience to customize something for us," Katz says. "We manage and monitor risk in all of our businesses obviously, but the regulatory requirements for '40 Act are different and that required us to work closely with Imagine to make sure we capture all of these specific requirements."
For his part, Konigsberg says the major challenge for a small fund manager tackling '40 Act is reacting at speed.
"A lot of the challenge is around data collection and the rules for '40 Act compliance," he explains. "On the fund-of-funds side we generally receive data on a monthly basis, P&L-type fund data. We'll get that and then run quantitative analytics around it, but it provides transparency. Seeding is a little bit different in that we do have daily transparency, like we do with the mutual fund. In dealing with '40 Act, we are monitoring regulatory rules daily, including limits around diversification, commodity income, position concentration, liquidity, and leverage, to name a few. Many of the rules in place require us to address potential issues immediately."
Iterative Approach
After hashing out the project specifications with Imagine, the plan was to create an additional function within Larch Lane's platform that tracks '40 Act rules separately from standard investment measures. The design process, Konigsberg says, was purposely iterative, because some of the rules are "pretty historic" and many could soon be modified by the SEC as the regulator takes a closer look into these products.
"We use the system in two ways: investment risk —running stress tests and what-if scenarios — but then we worked with Imagine to build an additional dashboard that tracks the '40 Act rules separately," the CRO says. "Part of the complexity we have with building this type of product is that, with some of the calculations on different rules, there isn't a lot of guidance coming from regulators, which required us to do a lot of research and work closely with experts in the field. We ultimately would get rules defined and work together to create the appropriate dashboard, testing it and modifying over time."
As Larch Lane has used the system more and more, there have been "tweaks post-launch," he adds. "We’ve worked with them to refine the technology, and now we rely heavily on what we’ve built together."
And it is set to influence the way the firm operates more broadly, according to Katz. "The way we're looking at risk in the mutual fund transfers to our other portfolios. Imagine was flexible in helping us create this particular product, and we're sure it will inform us on how we manage risk going forward."
The Bottom Line
- As alternatives houses eye '40 Act mutual funds as a new vehicle to raise capital and investors seek easier access to risk, they have found few technology solutions that can handle '40 Act rules without significant customization.
- Among these requirements are limits around fund diversification, commodity income, position concentration, liquidity, and leverage, which Larch Lane Advisors — a new '40 Act entrant partnering with Rothschild — built into a proprietary monitoring dashboard with the help of Imagine Software.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.