AcadiaSoft Launches Consulting Services for Initial Margin Rules
Vendor will provide a service that advises banks and buy-side firms seeking margin-model approval from the Fed ahead of 2018 deadline
To calculate margin requirements for these contracts, most will use a methodology designed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (Isda)—the Swaps Initial Margin Model (Simm). However, despite the fact that this was developed by a consortium of banks and buy-side firms, the Simm model in use at each participant requires authorization from the US Federal Reserve.
“The Isda Simm model and its appropriate governance and use covers many different aspects of derivatives risk management, and the Fed approval process could address any of these as part of a firm’s application to use it,” says Mark Demo, product director at AcadiaSoft, adding that it currently supports all firms in the first phase and the second, set for September 2017.
As a result, AcadiaSoft has made the first offering for its Expert Services consulting business one that assists those preparing for compliance with the rules around margin, which it calls Isda Simm Approval Guidance.
“Because of this, we understand the initial margin requirements better than any other firm in the world and we feel this experience can help firms that may not regularly deal with regulators on topics such as model validation, governance, and back testing. We can help streamline and simplify these firms’ efforts to prepare their application to regulators,” he continues.
One of the key ways in which clearinghouses manage risk in the over-the-counter (OTC) markets is through the exchange of collateral—initial margin, calculated to protect against the event of counterparty default, and variation margin, which reflects the changing economics of the contract, and collateralizes the side that is out of the money.
However, derivatives that have not been mandated for central clearing did not traditionally have such formalized structures around them until September 2016, when the very largest banks began to exchange initial margin in line with rules developed by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (Iosco) and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).
Phase two is set to come into play in September 2017 but is only expected to capture six banks, none of which are US-headquartered entities, according to WatersTechnology stablemate Risk.net.
Of more importance will be the third phase in September 2018, which will force not only large buy-side firms to begin exchanging initial margin on non-centrally cleared derivatives, but also some large banks that previously escaped categorization in the first wave.
“Generally speaking, firms should start their preparations for calculating, segregating and exchanging initial margin as early as possible,” says Demo. “From drafting clear and comprehensive governance models to making margin calculation modifications to negotiating new legal documentation and establishing tri-party agreements—we’ve learned these things take time to put in place.”
Implementing margin requirements for these types of contracts has proved troublesome in the past, not least of all when variation margin requirements entered into force on March 1, 2017. That involved a massive exercise among market participants to redraw contracts and paperwork to reflect the new rules, which was still largely incomplete by the deadline. US authorities have signaled that they will allow some leeway, but expect firms to be compliant by September 1.
The Expert Services business line is also set to expand beyond Simm approval guidance in the future.
“Services for initial margin calculation, reconciliation, and optimization are already in production and widely adopted. We also have sensitivity calculation services in pilot mode,” says Demo. “While we are still finalizing the additional Expert Services offerings, we hope to help firms understand routine monitoring and back testing output, including how to prepare and present data to regulators in order to maintain the ability to use the Isda Simm.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.