Asking the Right Questions
Welcome to the launch of MiFID Meg, the monthly column dedicated to comment, chat and debate on every data manager's favourite EU directive, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
For the record, from now on, Meg and Inside Reference Data will refer to the directive as MiFID. If you are involved in reference data and you do not know what MiFID stands for by now, please refer yourself to the Financial Services Authority Web site at www.fsa.gov.uk, or Europa, the EU online Web site, at www.europa.eu.int.
For those of you familiar with British tabloids, Meg is not affiliated with any mass-market newspaper psychics. However, that will not stop us from making our own predictions on MiFID from time to time.
As we count down to MiFID, this section will bring you updates on MiFID activities with the national regulators, MiFID projects within banks and institutions and activity in exchanges and data and software vendors. We plan to avoid any tedious articles along the lines of 'Is the Industry Ready for MiFID?' Frankly, we have seen enough articles, conference topics, Web events and so on discussing this issue.
Here's a more valid question: in the wake of the Level 2 draft of MiFID, what will be the true costs of implementation by investment banks in Europe and throughout the rest of the world? Industry-wide, that figure has been estimated to be between £500 million and £5 billion. The real price tag will be revealed over the next two years.
Recently, one data vendor commented to Meg that, "the only people reaping benefits from MiFID are the conference organizers."
With 19 months to go until the implementation deadline, we should be looking at the business benefits of MiFID and the practical realities of compliance. It's time for data managers to abandon the podiums and return to their back offices in order to prepare for the directive.
For any of you wishing to weigh in and pontificate on all things MiFID, Meg welcomes any and all debate. Please email us at mifidmeg@incsivemedia.com with your comments.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.