Automating Futures Markets: TST Interviews Tellefsen
THIS WEEK'S LEAD STORIES
In this issue, TST talks to Gerald Tellefsen about automation in the futures industry. During his 22-year career as a consultant, Tellefsen has done assignments for 10 exchanges. Prior to forming Tellefsen Consulting Group Inc. in 1984, Tellefsen was senior partner in Booz-Allen Hamilton Inc.'s securities industry group.
TST
: Why have futures exchanges been slower to adopt automation than stock exchanges?Tellefsen: Up until 10 or 15 years ago, futures exchanges were local and specialized. There wasn't a perceived need for automation. Historically, when there has been a problem in the futures industry, it has been solved with people, not computers.
The equities market reached a crisis point (1968) much sooner than the futures market and also had a regulatory requirement to develop a National Market System. These factors spurred the earlier adoption of automation.
The options industry has been the most progressive in terms of automation because there weren't a lot of cultural hurdles to overcome. After all, the CBOE was formed only in 1972.
TST
: What is the significance of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange teaming up with Reuters to form Post (Pre) Market Trade, an after-hours electronic trading system?Tellefsen: The step that the CME has taken with Reuters is a bold initiative, but then the CME has always been a pioneer. They're not afraid to take risks.
In signing up with Reuters, the CME has chosen an organization with a strong international presence and technology base. If after-hours electronic trading works, it will force other exchanges to re-examine their strategies.
TST
: Can computerized trading take the place of open outcry?Tellefsen: Automated execution has traditionally been anathema to the futures industry, but globalization and high volumes are changing this attitude. Other than using technology, how is a futures exchange going to provide a physical marketplace -- by building another Astrodome? Automated execution may be appropriate for certain kinds of transactions -- small orders and after-hours trading. But it remains to be seen whether it can provide the kind of price discovery and liquidity that face-to-face trading can. Also, it's conceivable that certain auto-execution systems may even increase the effectiveness of open outcry.
TST
: Why are exchanges such as the London Futures and Options Exchange and the New Zealand Futures Exchange turning to automated execution?Tellefsen: These are examples of how the trend of automated execution is starting to catch hold in the futures industry. In the case of a new market, and the different types of trading environments overseas, it may be more cost-efficient and effective to set up an electronic trading system. In addition, there is very little resistance to technology when you are starting from scratch, or when culture change is minimal.
TST
: Why hasn't Intex been more successful?Tellefsen: They made the mistake of starting out with a product (gold) that was already traded somewhere else and they never developed sufficient liquidity. They weren't filling a major need of the current market. Automatic execution can result in less errors and faster fills, but this is meaningless unless you have a market.
TST
: What roles can technology play on a futures exchange?Tellefsen: Systems can be developed for small order execution and to route orders from the customer to the broker on the floor. Floor-located devices can put a great deal of sophisticated information at the trader's fingertips.
TST
: What is your vision of the futures exchange of the future?Tellefsen: It has little to no paper and no out-trades. It has intra-day trade match and clearing capability and small order execution. There will be fewer people standing in the pit but their qualifications for being there will consist of more than having the money to buy or lease a seat. In addition, there will be some form of consolidated clearing, an issue that's been talked about for the last 15 years.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.