Bank-backed futures utility criticized as too ambitious
Osttra’s Joanna Davies is urging industry leaders to look for “quick wins”.
Efforts to simplify the futures trade lifecycle should be guided by pragmatism rather than grand designs of overhauling existing workflows, a top industry executive has said.
Dealers have backed the creation of a new utility to prevent a repeat of the operational bottlenecks that crippled futures trade processing during last year’s pandemic-induced market meltdown. The project is being led by FIA Tech, a for-profit subsidiary of the Futures Industry Association, which plans to simplify the futures trade lifecycle by standardizing the way market participants connect with each other and more than 70 exchanges.
Joanna Davies, head of FX and securities at Osttra, a new post-trade joint venture between CME Group and IHS Markit, said that vision “sounds like nirvana”. Instead, she urged “pragmatism in a first step to deliver quick wins.”
Davies has previously suggested one solution could be to take executing and clearing brokers out of the process and have clients communicate their allocation instructions directly to clearing houses using a common set of transaction data standards.
Julian Bennett, head of exchange-traded derivatives business development at Osttra, agreed that standardizing the data formats used by exchanges to identify trades could deliver faster results. “Everyone has an order ID on the trade, but everyone just changes it to their own systems’ order ID,” he said. “Creating a link between everybody’s order ID would give an indelible mark that leads right the way through from trade execution to clearing. That is the key to making allocations efficient.”
Davies also played down suggestions that distributed ledger technology should be the focus to improve futures trade workflows. “I think too often, we go down the road of identifying technology and force-fitting it to the problem, as opposed to the other way around,” she said.
Bennett and Davies were speaking on a panel at the Futures Industry Association’s IDX conference on September 27.
Speaking on the same panel, Nick Solinger, president and chief executive of FIA Tech defended plans to create a utility to manage trade allocations, saying there “needs to be a place for everyone to meet to exchange information”.
“Otherwise, everyone will still have their own reconciliations and matching and do it independently,” he said. “Our vision is working together to create a trade data network that sits parallel to the clearing workflow, that facilitates this exchange of information.”
“Why isn’t [processing] seamless end to end? Why isn’t it real-time?… And why are everybody’s commodity codes different?
Samina Anwar, Cargill
The futures industry has come under intense pressure from end-users and regulators to address the root causes of the back-office breakdown in March 2020, when a big increase in volumes led to a large number of trade breaks, resulting in missed margin payments and positions left on the books of the wrong brokers.
Speaking on a separate panel at the IDX conference, Samina Anwar, derivatives operations director at US food giant Cargill, said the debacle “absolutely hit across our companies”, leaving the firm unable to reconcile its books.
“What we’re looking for is absolutely less complexity and more efficiency,” she said. “Why isn’t [processing] seamless end to end? Why isn’t it real-time? Why do we have books and records that we’ve maintained, and then every participant along the chain is maintaining their own books and records? And why are everybody’s commodity codes different?”
Jonathan Morris, global head of listed derivatives operations at Goldman Sachs, also stressed the need to improve trade processing. “We all recognize that post-March 2020 there were several things that happened that none of us would want to go through again, and there’s definitely lessons to be learned,” he said, speaking on a third panel at the same conference. “Hopefully, through some of the standards work that we are doing, we’re definitely going to be a force for change.”
Speaking on the same panel as Morris, Meher Sutaria, head of global clearing operations for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JP Morgan, urged the industry to unite and press ahead with a solution before one is imposed on it.
“I think this is a unique opportunity for us to actually make a change because if we don’t do it with all the issues that were there last year, the regulators might force our hands to do it,” she said. “And then you can’t do it the way you might want to do it. It might be enforced on us. So, we need to make sure that we act.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.