Basel III Progress Report: Some Jurisdictions' Banks Struggling to Adjust IT Systems to Meet Requirements
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision also found "significant gaps" in data accuracy and adaptability.
The report, which is the seventh of its kind and looks at the implementation progress of member jurisdictions for Basel III requirements, was a product of the Committee's Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program. The program, according to the report, monitors progress adopting Basel III standards; assesses constancy among national and regional banking regulations with Basel III standards; and analyzes outcomes from the regulations.
The Committee found key progress has been made around risk-based capital standards and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). However, the report indicated some jurisdictions were having trouble meeting the deadline for five requirements.
Margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives, the deadline for which is September 2016, and the revised Pillar 3 framework, which comes into play at the end of 2016 and is regarding disclosure agreements for big banks, were both noted. A standardized way to measure counterparty credit risk, capital requirements for central counterparty (CCP) exposures and capital requirements for equity investments in funds, all which have January 2017 implementation deadlines, were also listed.
The report notes that the challenges some jurisdictions were facing in meeting deadlines were related to processes for rulemaking at the local level and banks "difficulties in adjusting their information systems to meet and report on the new requirements," according to the report.
Specific jurisdictions having difficulty meeting the deadlines were not named.
Some jurisdictions inability to meet implementation deadlines puts added pressure on those that were able to meet the requirements in time, the report says.
"Since the publication of these principles in 2013, banks have made noticeable gains, particularly in establishing or strengthening banks' internal governance frameworks, and, in general, improving their risk data aggregation and risk reporting capabilities," the report notes. "However, as highlighted in the third annual progress report on banks' adoption of these principles that was published by the Committee in December 2015, there are still areas where banks fall short of full implementation. This is especially the case with the timely completion of the necessary large-scale data architecture and IT infrastructure projects. Significant gaps were also identified in terms of data accuracy and adaptability. Additional work needs to be done to meet the intent of the principles in these areas."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.