Bitfinex Bolsters Surveillance Capabilities with Irisium Platform
Irisium Surveillance will help the bitcoin exchange to better monitor for volume manipulation, wash-trading and fake liquidity.
The newly installed, multi-asset system detects unusual patterns of behavior or signals that indicate manipulation. Irisium, which was formerly known as Ancoa Software, will help Bitfinex—a digital asset trading platform that launched in 2012—monitor for market abuses such as volume manipulation, wash-trading and fake liquidity.
Paolo Ardoino, CTO of Bitfinex, says the exchange currently has an in-house tool it uses to analyze trades coming across the exchange, but the addition of Irisium’s platform will help it to bolster its defenses.
“We really try to fight against who is trying to abuse our system. … If we start allowing these practices then we ruin the game for everyone and that is something we cannot allow,” he says.
Alastair Goodwin, CEO of Irisium, says this partnership with Bitfinex is an example of a “proactive” move in the right direction and sends the “right signals to the marketplace” as the industry gears up for the possibility of regulators in the US and Europe getting more involved in the crypto marketplace.
Ardoino says this recent move is unrelated to a hack in 2016 that resulted in a security breach that saw over $60 million worth of bitcoin stolen—the third largest bitcoin heist at the time—but he hopes that this can serve as a step toward creating a standard among digital currency exchanges.
“I would like to see some sort of standard, a standard policy among all the exchanges, and more transparency,” he says.
Goodwin adds that although it is not a requirement of digital currency exchanges to implement such surveillance measures, it is an important step in the right direction and creates confidence in the markets.
“I think it’s probably in the best interest of these marketplaces to be proactive, like Bitfinex, to put these type of systems in place and demonstrate the right governance, controls and oversight, because if they don’t—as we have seen with the likes of Mifid II and MAR and all the other regulations they have brought in Europe—the chances are that governments will have an obligation to step in and put regulation in place,” Goodwin says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.