BST North America Panel: Will Cloud Kill the IT Department?
There is no doubt that in the years since cloud technology has come into play in the capital markets the scalability of it has allowed firms to cut infrastructure costs. But as more businesses outsource different solutions to the cloud, is there a chance the cloud could stand in for an entire IT department?
That was the point made by one audience member of the cloud panel discussion at the Buy-Side Technology North American Summit in New York.
Cloud Taking Over?
During the question-and-answer period of the panel, Simon Hazlitt, co-founder of Majedie Asset Management, made the case for the cloud eventually taking over for firms' IT departments within the next decade.
"Clearly, we're talking Christmas with a lot of turkeys in a room, and I appreciate that," Hazlitt says. "That's why the cloud is this difficult thing that IT are talking about. There are some rather disingenuous arguments about elasticity and spinning things up quicker, because that's the only way that you can position it as an IT department."
The panel, which was made up of Nathan Boylan, formerly the head of IT operations at Lord Abbett & Co.; Jay Leek, Blackstone's chief information security officer (CISO); Tara Castleberry, head of architecture with AIG; and Mike Lobosco, director of STP Product Management for Advent; and moderator Elliot Noma, managing director of Garrett Asset Management, made its counterpoint for why cloud and internal IT departments can coexist.
Still a Place for Internal IT
Leek said he disagreed with Hazlitt, using a friend's experience as a CISO at a Fortune 10 company to make his point.
The firm, which Leek did not name, implemented an outsourcing initiative in the late 1990s that was a 70–30 split between third-party and in-house technology. Recently, the same company has been looking to reverse, bringing more technology back into the company.
"They're not getting the efficiency they want," said Leek. "Their business productivity is not where it needs to be, and they found that they don't have anybody that knows how their business runs. ... It's a serious problem for them, because they have these architects and thought leaders, but no one understands exactly how it works."
Leek said his example might be a bit extreme, and IT departments should probably shrink, but he can't see firm's entire technology divisions disappearing.
While Lobosco said he's seen an uptick in outsourcing, starting with smaller firms and bleeding into larger institutions, it's really a case-by-case situation depending on the type of business.
"Firms of certain profiles are going to have the ability to have IT resources do more stuff and have more control and to better leverage technology in certain ways," Lobosco said. "It's basically 'what kind of firm are you?' is ultimately what the question is about, right? Are you willing to give up some things to gain some things in different places? I don't think the cloud is ultimately going to be a one-size-fits-all thing."
The panel wasn't completely against Hazlitt's point, as Boylan said he could see small firms heading in that direction. Larger businesses, however, have the ability to compete with third-party technology providers, according to Boylan.
Boylan said the most change will occur in specialized areas of internal IT departments. Being well-rounded as employees is key, as firms look to cut costs at every opportunity.
"If you are focused on a very siloed, commodity-based technology ... those are all skills that can now be bought off the shelf," Boylan says. "Either you become more well-rounded technologists or, potentially, you'll end up working for a service provider."
The Bottom Line
- The development of cloud technology has led to firms outsourcing so much that they could potentially eliminate their entire internal IT department.
- The size of a business is still a huge factor in whether it makes sense for a firm to carry a larger technology division. Larger firms' internal technology departments can compete with third-party vendor solutions.
- One area where there seem to be cutbacks in most firms are niche technologists working on solutions that companies are now buying off the shelf.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.