CAT Seeks Approval to Mask Personal Data
The CAT is required to gather personal information, but the CAT NMS committee wants to use a masking method for security.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b60c4/b60c456900c7d4fde4c206823e773ddcefb28943" alt="lock-security-data"
The self-regulatory organizations (SROs) behind the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) are asking the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to allow the system not to gather certain personal information.
In a letter dated January 29, the CAT NMS plan committee asked the SEC to let the CAT refrain from collecting and storing social security numbers, dates of birth, and individual trader account numbers. It asked the regulator to approve the use of a planned CAT Customer ID (CCID) that will be created based on personally identifiable information (PII) of individual traders and customers.
“The participants believe that the proposed CCID alternative is necessary and appropriate in the public interest, and is consistent with the public interest, the protection of investors, the maintenance of fair and orderly markets and the removal of impediments to, and perfection of the mechanisms of, a national market system,” the letter said.
The SROs that make up the CAT NMS committee added that using an alternative such as the CCID “would enhance the security of the [CAT] central repository while preserving the regulatory benefits of the CAT.”
While the SEC is aware of the CCID and its firm-specific counterpart, the Firm Designated ID (FDID), it has not formally approved its use. Under the national market system plan, the CAT NMS is required to collect PII as a means to identify individual traders and customers for the purpose of tracking transactions. However, concerns over data security have increased since the CAT was conceived back in 2010.
During a Senate committee hearing on SEC oversight on December 10, the regulator’s chairman, Jay Clayton, said it is working with the CAT NMS to “significantly limit phone book information and allow us to do the job,” while protecting sensitive data.
The FDID will keep track of reporting firms, and although it tracks customer accounts, no actual account numbers are linked to it. While the CCID is generated using information that includes social security numbers, the end product that is seen in the CAT system will be masked; rather, the social security numbers that refer to the CCID will be kept in the SEC’s databases and will not be visible in the CAT. The role of protecting those social security numbers will therefore be retained by the SEC.
With the request still pending, industry testing of the CAT continues. The current test period is aimed at checking the data validation of trades sent through the CAT system, and only covers transaction information. CAT reporters currently in the test environment do not send individual trader information, as customer and account data are not required until January 2022, when the operator—Finra CAT—plans to begin testing this feature.
Individual customer, trader, and account data are not currently required in the existing order audit trail system (Oats) that the CAT is meant to replace.
Testing began on December 16 and will run until April, when CAT reporters will be required to prove that their data has an error rate of 10% or less in order to participate in live production by April 20.
Live production of the CAT in April is aimed mainly at industry members that deal with equities and were previously Oats reporters. Options, specific to large broker-dealers, go live a month later. Full production is expected to take place by December 2021.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.