CFTC Approves LedgerX Bitcoin CCP
Long-awaited ruling shows digital currencies are pushing for institutional-grade market structure
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gave its long-awaited approval to LedgerX’s derivatives clearing organization (DCO) application on July 24, which will permit the firm to clear swaps on bitcoin.
“A U.S. federally-regulated venue for derivative contracts settling in digital currencies opens the market to a much larger customer base,” said Paul Chou, CEO of LedgerX, in a statement. “We are seeing strong demand from institutions that previously could not participate in the bitcoin market due to compliance restrictions against unregulated venues. In particular, there is a desire for fund managers to hold financial instruments that are not correlated with the broader equity market, and digital currencies meet that need.”
LedgerX will initially offer options on bitcoin, but plans to extend its product offerings to other instruments, and further digital currencies, in the future, according to people familiar with the situation. The CFTC has also granted LedgerX an exemption from Section 39 of the Commodity Exchange Act, which would have required the clearinghouse to undertake monthly stress tests of its financial resources to ensure that it could withstand the default of its largest participant.
As LedgerX’s options model is fully collateralized, the CFTC accepted that this requirement did not necessarily apply as it would to clearinghouses that use initial and variation margin models, and granted an exemption.
The approval follows an order from the CFTC on July 6, 2017 granting full registration to its swap execution facility (SEF). LedgerX’s DCO will clear solely for the SEF at present.
The applications for both the SEF and the DCO registration have been in holding for some time, with LedgerX initially filing its application in 2014. The CFTC extended the initial comment period on the application, in part due to the nature of the digital currency market, which has struggled to gain official sanction from other regulators regarding different products.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission, for instance, rejected a rule amendment filed by Bats Global Markets in March 2017, which would have allowed the exchange operator to list an exchange-traded fund that tracks bitcoin. The SEC is reviewing its decision following an appeal by Bats in April 2017. Bats declined to comment on the progress of that review.
LedgerX’s approval is the latest attempt to create an institutional-grade infrastructure around the digital currency market—another SEF, TeraExchange, also offers forwards on digital currencies—and particularly important in terms of encouraging institutional interest in the nascent asset class, which has so far been limited due in large part to perceived flaws in its market structure.
Digital currencies do not include elements of market structure found in more mature asset classes, for instance, such as a functioning derivatives market for hedging purposes, segregated custody or intermediary roles, prime brokerage functions or other such areas.
However, efforts are underway to offer products in this regard. XBT Provider, owned by Jersey-based asset manager Global Advisors, lists two exchange-traded products that track bitcoin on Nasdaq Nordic, while a number of bitcoin-specific hedge funds have been created in recent years.
Despite this, efforts are at an early stage. The SEC, in rejecting the Bats rule amendment, cited the lack of maturity in market structure and its potential vulnerability to market manipulation in its reasoning.
An in-depth feature on institutional engagement with digital currencies—and the hurdles that have yet to be overcome before they can be considered an investable asset class—will be published in the August issue of Waters magazine.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.