Coleman Launches Interactions Platform
The cloud-based offering allows buy-side clients to manage their interactions with research providers, industry experts and analysts.
Coleman Research has launched Coleman Exchange, a cloud-based platform that enables buy-side firms to track their research communications and interactions with partners, industry experts, sell-side analysts, and third-party providers.
Users can plug into a single system on a subscription basis to log and monetize their interactions with other participants during phone calls, conference sessions, meetings, and other events.
The platform records key aspects of the research interactions lifecycle and can be used to publish participants’ availability, schedule appointments for consultations, manage subscriptions, and invoice for analysts’ services. Coleman Exchange is designed to produce real-time reports based on research consumption and the underlying cost of each interaction, to comply with EU unbundling rules mandated by the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II).
“The sell side may put a value on a subscription, but because of Mifid II the buy side needs to determine the value of a research report, the value of a phone call and the value of a face-to-face meeting,” says Kevin Coleman, CEO and president of Coleman Research. “So our platform via our subscription management feature can allow the buy side to put a value on a particular phone call down to the minute.”
Sell-side firms commonly track this information using a customer relationship management system, which is later handed to the buy side to fulfill reporting requirements. Coleman explains that this platform will allow buy-side firms to take control of their reporting and document their own correspondence with banks and third parties in real time. Users can also manage entitlements and reverse entitlements, based on availability to select users.
“We also have entitlements, which basically allows sell-side institutions to control which buy-side institutions get to see that availability,” says Coleman. “We also have reverse entitlements, so that buy-side institutions can also control if they want to be able to see the availability of that sell-side analyst on the particular call.”
As an alternative deployment option, the underlying features and functions can also be fully integrated into a firm’s internal system through application programming interfaces (APIs). Looking ahead, Coleman Research has built in a project management capability that will allow buy-side firms in the future to not only manage their correspondence for reporting requirements but organize a historical record for managing projects.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.