CryptoCompare Eyes Asia Cryptocurrency Indexes
The cryptocurrency data provider and index operator plans to exploit demand for digital currency trading in APAC by launching index products in the region.
Digital currency data provider CryptoCompare is preparing to launch digital currency indexes for Asian markets to help drive the takeup of trading digital assets and market data in the region.
The vendor began talks with an as-yet-unnamed regional partner in April, and expects to have a product ready by August.
“We think the Far East will be very fertile ground for us—some of the big institutional names in Asia are really looking at us,” says James Harris, commercial director at CryptoCompare. “We’re working with some very well-known institutional names … that create indexes for other asset classes that track billions of dollars. They recognize that clients want something in this space, and they know they need to offer something.”
One challenge is the need to create products that—although digital currencies trade globally—have local appeal. “You’re not going to find a big Japanese institution investing in a US-based Bitcoin ETF; they want a local equivalent,” Harris says, adding that data plays a key role in understanding how digital currencies trade in different regional markets. “When an asset manager moves into digital assets, they don’t just buy Bitcoin; they buy data to be able to understand the market.”
Another challenge is understanding how the nuances of each market or jurisdiction affect the price of digital currencies traded regionally. “There can be local perturbances in the price similar to how some commodity markets trade. But instead of storage and transportation costs, the frictions in digital currencies come in the form of local capital controls and local supply and demand imbalances,” says CryptoCompare CEO Charles Hayter. “In 2017 and 2018, these were very common where Korean exchanges and Japanese exchanges were isolated and couldn’t cater to local population-specific manias. The situation and global web of liquidity are much improved now. However, there are still pockets of underserved markets that mean there are rich pickings for hedge funds looking at these market discrepancies.”
The vendor is accustomed to sourcing local data to support local investment products. “In conjunction with our partner MVIS [MV Index Solutions, a subsidiary of New York-based investment manager VanEck], we build indexes that are tailored to the needs of our clients who are building financial products that refer to them, in addition to our headline reference rate products for Bitcoin and other assets,” Hayter says. “We do find that there are regional preferences. For instance, if a client is launching an index in Japan, we would use Japanese yen-denominated prices from Japanese exchanges for the index composition.”
Beyond traded prices on different marketplaces, CrytptoCompare also captures other types of data from a variety of sources, including derivatives markets, the underlying blockchain records, datasets of know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering data, content from social media platforms, as well as taxonomies to ensure investors can compare like-for-like assets, and specialist crypto datasets from partner IntoTheBlock.
“This ecosystem has been fragmented, but it is coming together. … Because digital assets can be held anywhere, the role of a data vendor to aggregate data becomes even more important,” Hayter says.
Harris adds that large institutional investors are becoming more sophisticated in how they trade crypto assets, and thus are looking for more information and index options.
“More and more, big macro investors are realizing that there is a match between this asset class and the profile of other asset classes. For example, it may have the same properties as gold, as an inflation hedge,” Harris says. “Indexes are important because they can drive adoption … and allow firms to create products against them. As a company, that gives us an extra revenue stream that cements us into the asset class itself. For example, if a client charges their customer 0.5% in fees, we might receive 4 basis points of that. So the more that clients start piling up assets under management in digital currencies, the more we benefit as a whole.”
The move is a continuation of CryptoCompare’s transformation away from an ad-driven information portal to a subscriptions-driven data provider, which began in early 2017 as part of a strategy to give the vendor greater control over its recurring revenues. Since starting its index business in 2018 in response to demand for digital currency ETFs, the vendor now operates around 50 indexes.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.