Direct Edge Expands Attributed Quote Program
Direct Edge filed a proposal with the Securities and Exchange Commission today, Tuesday, April 22, to introduce a standard "retail" attribution, which it expects to introduce to its market in early June─following a mandatory SEC period to allow for comments responding to the proposal─as part of the next software release of its trading platform.
Currently, most of the trading on Direct Edge's EDGX market is conducted on an anonymous basis, with 10 percent now attributed to specific firms placing orders. The new scheme will allow firms to designate orders as "retail" without having to reveal which firm is placing the order. For example, if a firm dominates trading in a particular stock, any trade could have a large market impact, so the firm may want to minimize the impact of any market movement on its trades by anonymizing its activity on certain occasions.
Initially, firms will be able to do this by picking the incoming port via which their order flow travels, to designate order flow as having full attribution, just designating it as retail, or no attribution. However, this would apply to the firm's entire order flow. As part of a later release this summer, Direct Edge will introduce the ability for firms to specify their designated attribution on an order-by-order basis, says Bryan Harkins, executive vice president and head of US markets at BATS Global Markets.
Direct Edge began offering trading with attribution in February 2013, as a means to attract market makers to retail flow on EDGX, which is the top US destination for retail limit orders, Harkins says. As a result of the initiative, 10 percent of orders on EDGX are now attributed, and─based on analysis conducted by the exchange in the first quarter of this year─attracts 18 percent more executions than unattributed orders, he adds.
"We are rolling out this program based on customer feedback... so we think firms like more flexibility and choice," Harkins says. "It's hard to argue with the statistics that fill rates are higher, but there are cases where a firm may not want to give up its full name."
In addition, firms that consent to full attribution split 25 percent of the revenues Direct Edge earns from selling its datafeed as part of a revenue-sharing incentive program, whereas firms that choose the standard retail designation will not receive any revenue share.
Whether the new designation will adversely impact fill rates has yet to be seen. "Is there a tradeoff between that 18 percent higher fill rate and lower fill rates if orders are not fully disclosed? We'll know more over the coming months as we roll this out," Harkins says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.