Dow Jones Raises Stake In Telerate To 56 Percent With $300 Million Block Purchase
THIS MONTH'S LEAD STORIES
Dow Jones & Co.'s interest in Telerate, Inc. crept over the 50 percent mark with its $300 million acquisition of a five million share block from Forstmann-Leff Associates, Inc. The $57.50/share price shocked some observers, but by paying it, Dow Jones boosted its stake to almost 56 percent of Telerate's common shares.
Despite its valuation of Telerate at $2.7 billion, $57.50 is "not an outrageous price," says Andrew Wallach, an analyst at Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. "It's really in the realm of tender offer/ takeover rather than a normal market purchase."
According to Wallach, "the multiple that seems to be paid in a lot of these information business acquisitions is roughly three to three-and-a-half times next year's revenues." Applied in reverse to what Dow Jones paid, however, this formula yields a projected next year's revenue of over $750 million, which is optimistic even for Telerate.
While some, including Wallach, think Dow Jones is inexorably creeping toward full ownership of Telerate, a provision in the Forstmann-Leff agreement may inhibit its ability to do so during the next 12 months. Should Dow initiate a tender offer for the rest of Telerate's shares at more than $57.50, it's obligated to pay the higher price to Forstmann. By the same token, if Dow sells more than ten percent of its holdings at more than $57.50, it has to hand over the balance to Forstmann.
"In hindsight it would have been a great idea for them to buy the whole company at 20," says Wallach.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.