DSB Increases Fees as User Numbers Grow
London-based DSB, the global utility for ISINs, raises fees for current user contracts through 2018.
According to DSB, the biggest revenue impact was an increase from 66 to 78 power users, while the pool of users accessing the utility’s free data services jumped 93 percent.
“Whilst we are delighted with the large uptake of the DSB’s free, open data services, we are mindful that the smaller-than-expected number of users contributing to the DSB’s cost recovery results in an increase in individual user fees,” says Emma Kalliomaki, DSB managing director, in a statement. She adds that DSB believes user numbers will grow further as it continues to receive new inquiries from firms just realizing they will be creating over-the-counter ISINs. The company also expects to add users as a result of the increase in systematic internalizers later in 2018.
User fees pay for DSB’s overheads, which amount to €9.2 million ($11.3 million), 4.8 percent higher than the €8.8 million previously stated. According to DSB, the fee calculation was based on the contracts in force as of January 5 and the user categories those contracts represent. Currently, investment banks bear the highest burden of cost recovery, at 54 percent, followed by trading venues, which cover 33 percent. Other sectors, including asset management and data management, cover 13 percent. Excess revenues caused by additional contracts signed after January 5 will go to defraying user fees for the next contract year. Fees for infrequent users remain at €3,000 annually, mid-level users see an increase from €22,000 to €37,500, and the annual fee for power users has almost doubled from €65,000 to €112,500.
“The proportionately higher participation of banks relative to trading venues in the cost recovery validates the design of the OTC-ISIN as internally useful for business operations beyond satisfying reference data reporting obligations under Mifid II,” says Kalliomaki.
Later this year, DSB will reopen the fee model consultation with the industry, with a goal of redefining the cost-recovery model for 2019 by evaluating data and usage patterns in 2018.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.