Europe Trails U.K. in Mifid Prep
COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES
LONDON—The disparities between Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid)-related activities in the U.K. and continental Europe have been growing ever since a large consortium of banks announced the creation of two Mifid projects dubbed Project Boat and Project Turquoise, industry watchers tell DWT.
In September, nine global securities firms, under the Project Boat name, announced plans to create a trade data and market data dissemination platform to take advantage of the this requirement in Mifid. ABN Amro, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and UBS signed a letter of intent and term sheet to gather trade transparency information across Europe (DWT, Oct. 26).
Under the codename Project Turquoise, the same group of banks, but without ABN Amro or HSBC, also announced in November that they were creating a pan-European equities trading platform in the form of a new multilateral trading facility (DWT, Nov. 20).
Absent from these projects are large banks from France, Italy, Spain or any other Mediterranean and Eastern European countries.
"We see the U.K. leading in [the Mifid] space," says Nigel Matthews, capital markets director at Oracle Europe, Middle East and Africa. "The Germans are catching up fast, and the Nordic are showing an interest in [Mifid]," he adds.
However, P.J. Di Giammarino, founder and CEO of JWG-IT Group, a Mifid think tank, does not rule out a change in dynamics. "There won't be one version of [Project] Boat," he says. "There may be a Club Med version of Boat or an Eastern European version of Boat."
Although these projects seem to exclude particular countries, they are still beneficial for the market. "The industry is getting together," says Matthews. "They focus on the areas where they can leverage competitive advantage. Twelve months ago, nobody really believed there was an opportunity for banks to gain that advantage," he adds.
Firms also need to make time for testing, says Di Giammarino. "Your test plans need to be in place by March 2007 if you want to be ready," he says. "For every £1 you do not spend on testing, it will cost you £6 to fix it."
However, "member states will need a kick in the behind to take action and implement [Mifid]," says Kenneth Mullen, a partner in the media and technology team with Edinburgh-based law firm Shepherd and Wedderburn.
Olivier Laurent
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.