FactSet Pairs its OEMS with CG Blockchain's Distributed Ledger
This is an early-adoption example of an OEMS being coupled with tools on a live blockchain.
FactSet and distributed-ledger technology (DLT) provider CG Blockchain have entered into a partnership that will allow users of FactSet’s order and execution management system (OEMS) to access CG Blockchain’s products through the latter’s app store, BCT Fundstore.
Additionally, CG Blockchain’s current and future users will also be able to use FactSet’s OEMS—which became part of the FactSet stable as a result of its 2015 acquisition of Portware—as FactSet is the exclusive OEMS partner for the DLT provider, says John Adam, FactSet’s global head of portfolio management and trading solutions.
While the service is not immediately available to clients, Adam anticipates it going live soon.
“CG Blockchain is fully live; FactSet OEMS is fully live. We are in process and have already started writing the interface between the two,” Adam says. “We would expect to have our first clients using the full suite of solutions probably in the next couple of months.
This partnership effectively integrates blockchain technology with an OEMS, which will allow for a real-time, immutable recording of transactions to CG Blockchain’s distributed ledger, ComplianceGuard. Adam says that compliance and auditable events will be locked into the ledger, thus providing greater transparency and security for investors.
“It’s an unfortunate reality that in the past there has been some level of fraud or deception among certain investors and that causes the plan sponsors and the end-investor to have concerns over. Are you managing my money the way you say you are; are there proper controls and compliance in place?” Adam says. “The value of doing this on a blockchain is that it’s a distributed ledger and it’s unalterable. The purpose of that technology is designed so that it cannot be tampered with. If that transaction is sitting in a database or a file log, I could potentially change it. So having that be external from the fund, and having an unalterable and tamper-proof record of that transaction—and that transaction is within the compliance rules, both for the fund construction and also the actual regulations, whether that’s Mifid II or 40 Act—certainly provides piece-of-mind for the end-investor.”
Adam says that currently, FactSet captures these events and stores them in a data warehouse for the fund’s internal use only, but then moving that information around—which is highly sensitive—can become an issue.
“So the information is there, but it’s never been available in this way, and that’s what’s so truly disruptive about this,” he says. “It’s moving from something that was periodic and manual, to online and real time.”
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.