Fed hiring more staff to examine cloud providers
The regulator wants to put more “boots on the ground” at firms such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft.
The US Federal Reserve is hiring more staff to perform on-the-ground examinations of software giants that provide cloud services to the banking system.
Bank regulators visited the offices of Amazon Web Services in 2019 to conduct the first formal examination of a cloud service provider. Arthur Lindo, deputy director for policy at the Federal Reserve Board’s division of supervision and regulation, said more such examinations were on the way.
“We’re increasing our workforce just to do that,” Lindo said at the OpRisk North America conference on May 18, adding: “There needs to be a public-private approach. It can’t just be the firms applying pressure to the providers, and the official sector sitting back.”
Lindo noted that the Bank Service Company Act of 1962 grants federal regulators the authority to examine outsourcing providers. “And for at least one of the large providers, we do that,” he said. “But let’s look at the stature of that large provider versus the stature of our examinations team. If you do the ‘boots on the ground’ type analogy, and trying to go into [all] the major cloud providers, we don’t have enough in the way of resources to do that. So we have to be smarter, we have to be more effective in that space.”
He suggested that federal agencies could pool their resources to ensure proper oversight of software giants. “Even with that increase that we’ve put into place, we just don’t have the person power. So what else could we use? We have other tools we can leverage, working with the US Treasury as well as other members of the financial services sector. So we can use our collective convening power.”
Lindo stressed that his views were his own, rather than those of the Fed.
As more and more critical services are outsourced, regulators have become increasingly concerned that overreliance on the big three service providers – Amazon, Google and Microsoft – could place financial institutions and their customers at risk.
We do have concentration risk, even if we don’t call it that
Arthur Lindo, US Fed
“We do have concentration risk, even if we don’t call it that,” Lindo said. “But how do you mitigate that? You do it through resiliency testing and further disclosures, as well as capability management with the outsourcing provider.”
Banks that move their data to the cloud will typically conduct stress tests, known as failovers, to assess fallback options in the event of the non-availability of one or more major cloud vendors. “So, that’s been tested – we expect to see more of that. [But] in terms of substitutability, I think at this point we have to be honest: there is no substitutability option,” Lindo said. “The idea that a firm can move services wholesale to another outsourcing provider, in the short term, is unrealistic.”
Regulators are already co-operating on an international level to address concentration risk. An informal joint initiative involving the Fed, the US Treasury and their European counterparts is set to take place next week, said Lindo.
“It’s a combination of regulatory agencies and also the treasury functions in major jurisdictions,” Lindo said of the initiative. “If we can have a dialogue on what could go wrong, then we can mitigate the downside risk. We’re just one of the participants.” He declined to go into further detail.
Banks, for their part, have asked US regulators to provide more detailed guidance on the risks emanating from cloud service providers. They argue proposed guidance on third-party relationships does not distinguish between different types of outsourced services, and that cloud providers present unique risks that need to be spelled out more clearly.
Banks and cloud service providers have on occasion clashed over data-retention policies and access to data, with lines of responsibility often becoming blurred. Service providers say such problems usually arise because of misconfigurations by the customer. They have also become more sensitive to the fact that third-party outsourcing relationships are being subjected to increased scrutiny and have tried to help banks navigate the regulatory barriers that may be erected in the future.
Google Cloud, for example, maintains a large team practised in mapping cloud controls to financial services regulatory expectations. The team is made up of a number of ex-bank professionals, including the former head of op risk at Goldman Sachs, Phil Venables, as chief information security officer.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.