Fidelity Quietly Shutters ActionsXchange; Low Margins of Corporate Actions Biz Blamed
Officials remain silent on the closure, which has been in the works since last year, sources say.
Fidelity Investments is in the process of shutting down its Fidelity Corporate Actions Solutions (formerly known as Fidelity ActionsXchange) business line and its corporate actions data validation service, prompting an exodus of clients to alternative solutions, WatersTechnology has learned.
The firm decided to bow out of the space in August 2019, sources say, and clients have spent the past year identifying and migrating to alternative providers. The vendor informed clients but has not made any formal announcement about the closure or given any reason for its decision. And those providers tasked with filling the gap left by Fidelity’s departure report drastically differing experiences: Some vendors say the move has handed them an influx of new clients, and that Fidelity collaborated with clients and vendors to identify alternative solutions, though others say Fidelity has provided little assistance in transferring clients to new providers.
“Customers are very angry. They’ve been left in the lurch. Some of them had long-term contracts,” says an executive at one data provider, who says it was months before Fidelity informed them of the decision, and even longer to transition clients because Fidelity—not the corporate actions data providers themselves—controlled the relationships with the end clients of its service, making it difficult to ensure a smooth transition.
Fidelity Corporate Actions Solutions provides a cleansed and normalized managed feed of corporate actions and tools for handling the corporate actions process at end-user firms. It captures corporate actions feeds from third-party vendors, then formats the announcements into a composite record. It also combines validated information with data from clients or their custodians into a composite summary that clients can use to monitor key event dates and manage exceptions via a workstation. Additionally, it offers a notification and response workflow tool for automating instructions to portfolio managers and custodians, and software to calculate and automate the processing of payments arising from corporate actions.
Sources say two factors most likely prompted Fidelity’s decision to close the business: First, other vendors have made inroads into this market in recent years, and second, the nature of corporate actions processing as a low-margin business. The costs of operating in this space can be high—particularly the cost of acquiring corporate actions datafeeds from multiple vendors before even applying any proprietary value—and as the oldest provider in the space, Fidelity may have needed to make technology upgrades that simply weren’t worth the expense.
“The cost dynamics of running a managed service in this space are pretty tough to manage. Costs are often higher than revenue, and you need global critical mass,” says Virginie O’Shea, CEO of Firebrand Research, whose first research paper, published this summer, provided an analysis of the corporate actions space.
Sources say the most likely replacements are IHS Markit’s IMActions and FIS’ XSP services, though data management platform vendor GoldenSource is also reporting positive interest in its services, despite not being a direct competitor.
“Fidelity ActionsXchange is a long-standing and important participant in this marketplace,” says John Eley, CEO of GoldenSource. “Their decision to alter their business model has highlighted the need for software and service solutions that are flexible and can work with any data provider. We’ve already landed a client as a result of Fidelity’s actions, and are in talks with others about providing a solution that’s flexible in terms of workflow and support for other data sources.”
It’s not clear when Fidelity will stop supporting clients. Fidelity officials did not respond to requests for comment.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.