Financial Sector Should Commercialize Data Management Knowledge to Advance Other Industries
Just as there’s always money to be made from doing dirty jobs, there are opportunities around dirty data—especially in industries that are only now beginning to appreciate the value of being data-driven.
Data management within the capital markets wasn’t always an established and respected practice. It took many years of evangelism for data professionals to make their case for acceptance and a seat at the table, and to convince management of the importance of investment in data quality, and the sector has not one but two industry associations—FISD and the EDM Council—representing it.
Other industries outside finance are subject to similar data challenges, such as social media and messaging platforms handling millions of update messages, streaming media tracking subscribers’ watching habits and recommending new content, self-driving cars, courier services optimizing shipping routes, or how online retailers group items in their warehouses to automate and speed up packing and shipping. But in these industries, data management is not such a formal or standardized process, even though many of these depend on data to run their operations, provide analytics to improve their business processes, and give an understanding of how different datasets work together—and need to be integrated—to obtain beneficial outcomes, such as being able to harness the Internet of Things.
The EDM Council is currently expanding its membership and areas of coverage to participants and issues faced by other industries beyond finance, while the recently-established Enterprise Knowledge Graph Foundation piloted by former EDM Council managing director Mike Atkin is specifically cross-industry. Enterprise knowledge graphs define and link data using web standards, and a standard ontology, rather than traditional tabular databases, enabling users to incorporate a broader range of data and make more use of it, and have applications well beyond financial services.
And despite the claims of many companies, it’s hard to genuinely be data-driven without handling data properly in the first place. How data-driven are companies in reality? According to research from Alation, a provider of data governance, security, and analytics solutions, there’s still a substantial disconnect between how firms profess to use data and how they actually use it. For example, according to Alation’s first quarterly State of Data Culture Report, produced by Wakefield Research, despite 86% of the top 2,000 global companies having a c-level data officer, and 78% having company-wide initiatives to be more data-driven, two-thirds of CEOs still make decisions based on “gut feel” rather than metrics.
Alation created a Data Culture Index, which measures how well a company is positioned to support data-driven decision making, and scores companies based on three disciplines: data search and discovery, data literacy (the ability to analyze and draw conclusions from data), and data governance. However, while data governance was firms’ second-highest priority, only 12% of companies scored an A grade for their data culture, with almost two-thirds only achieving grades C through F.
So, most of the companies that make up the economies on which the financial markets place their bets don’t take data as seriously as the companies that invest in them. Who can help accelerate their education? How about financial firms?
We’ve all heard how banks have been commercializing internal datasets as alternative data sources for buy-side clients. But another area ripe for exploitation is the expertise that financial firms and their industry bodies have acquired over many years around data management. There’s a huge opportunity for associations like the EDM Council and FISD (perhaps through its non-finance-specific parent organization the Software & Information Industry Association) to commercialize that collective knowledge in a way that benefits other sectors, as well as their members among capital markets firms, who are often the ultimate consumers of the exhaust data generated by those other industries. That opportunity could be monetary (through training, standards, licensing, representation to a broader membership, and certification) or a change to shape and define the standards for non-financial datasets that they care about, to save integration and processing headaches further down the line.
All I ask is that when we arrive at standards that make it easier for non-financial companies to optimize, someone shares them with Domino’s, so they can finally figure out how to drive my pizza just 12 blocks in less time than it takes me to write this column.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.