Flat Fee Plan For LME Ticker Brings Vendors Together Against Reuters

THIS WEEK'S LEAD STORIES

Several London-based vendors of commodities prices have banded together to make sure they're not pushed around by the big kid on the block -- Reuters Ltd.

The group recently sent a letter to the London Metal Exchange protesting against the price structure for its new ticker because it favors Reuters over smaller vendors.

Bridge Information Systems, ICV Information Systems Ltd., Knight- Ridder/Unicom, Pont Data, Quotron Systems Inc. and Telerate Inc. are said to have signed the letter.

The LME recently hired Reuters to design and operate its first real-time pricing service, which was developed to comply with Britain's new Financial Services Act. Before the ticker was introduced, Reuters and Knight-Ridder/Unicom collected LME prices by placing reporters on the trading floor.

Sources say the LME wants to charge vendors an annual rate of 50,000 pounds sterling to receive the real-time pricing service and that half this fee would be paid to Reuters.

The letter sent to the LME says charging a flat fee for the ticker will discriminate against vendors with only a few subscribers receiving the LME price feed. The vendors have proposed a price structure based on the number of terminals that receive the ticker instead of charging a flat rate.

"The LME would make a lot more money if it charged some sort of end-user fee instead of charging a flat fee because that would encourage every vendor to take the feed and make it available to clients worldwide," says David Taylor, managing director of ICV Information Systems.

In addition to price structure, the vendors are concerned that Reuters will have better quality data since it is operating the price ticker.

The vendors have agreed not to publicly disclose the contents of the letter, says Taylor, because we "want the LME to have the opportunity to consider what we're proposing without the pressure of publicity."

However, Taylor says the LME has "responded favorably" to the suggestions made by the vendors and that he expects the issue to be resolved shortly. David King, director of finance for the LME, could not be reached for comment.

The revolt in London may be an isolated incident, but it serves as a warning for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which will offer its Globex electronic trading system on the Reuter Dealing 2000 system. Exchanges that depend on Reuters to supply infrastructure must take care not to offend other vendors.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here