GS1 US Looks at How to Help Financial Services Industry Solve Standards Challenge
NEW YORK—The US chapter of the international standards organization GS1 is assessing opportunities to create and manage classification schemes for the financial services industry to improve standardization, officials tell Inside Reference Data.
GS1, which has a presence in 108 countries, manages international standards for a large number of industries, such as retail and healthcare, but has so far not been involved in the financial services industry.
Bernie Hogan, senior vice-president and chief technology officer of New Jersey-based GS1 US, says the GS1 standards model has proved to be successful for 40 years now, with the barcode and identification system for the retail industry being one of the best known identification schemes. "Based on preliminary analysis, it looks like the GS1 system could be used by the financial services industry," he says.
The organization is continuously adding new standards, and GS1 in the US now serves more than 20 industries. The addition of standards for the financial industry can be based on the same model and approach as GS1 uses for other identification schemes.
"We sometimes have to make adjustments for different industries' needs, but it's more about having a focused adoption process," says Hogan, adding that the more industries GS1 covers, the more value the organization is providing.
If GS1 were to enter the financial services space, the organization would help administer standards and ensure everyone uses the same standards. The organization could potentially also expand coverage of some of its existing standards, such as the Global Location Number standard, which identifies physical locations and business entities.
The existing standards are already used by 1.5 million GS1 customers around the world, and many of these represent issuers, also relevant to the financial services industry. "We have a base that could just be extended," says Hogan.
GS1 standards, in many cases, are also ISO standards. "We participate in ISO on multiple levels, and a lot of our standards are submitted through the ISO process," he says, explaining that GS1 collaborates with ISO to ensure there is no duplication and to broaden reach.
Regulatory Pressure
Meanwhile, the increased pressure from regulators to improve transparency in the financial services industry has resulted in a growing focus on standards. Market participants suggest the standards problem has to be fixed before regulators can use data collected from the industry to analyze systemic risk.
The concern now is that the regulators will have to create standards for the financial services industry – something that could be done by an existing standards organization instead.
New York-based Richard Tinervin, Financial InterGroup Advisors, says some standards may need to be tailored, but the GS1 model has already proved to work in other industries. "GS1 works with each industry to come up with the appropriate system," he says.
Financial InterGroup Advisors, which earlier this year announced the introduction of a working group for the Central Counterparty for Data Management (CCDM), an initiative focused on bringing C-level executives together to promote a global data management utility in the financial services industry, has put together a project and business plan, where standards-setting is part of the focus.
New York-based Allan Grody, president of Financial Intergroup Advisers, says the idea is that the CCDM will arbitrate different content and put out arbitrated content sets. This type of utility approach would also be dependent on industry standards and promote operational efficiency and risk mitigation.
Yet, it is designed not to jeopardize the business models of data vendors nor the investment in legacy systems of financial institutions. "Some of the solutions [suggested for reference data utilities] require data vendors to give up the proprietary data models, which they use to produce their products and compete," says Grody, explaining that this will not be the case with the CCDM.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.