Hong Kong Government Sets Up Fintech Sandbox
Hong Kong’s regulator observed that more fintech initiatives were being explored by the banking industry.
The Fintech Supervisory Sandbox (FSS), he said, is catered to and for fintech and other technology initiatives of authorized institutions (AIs).
He notes that the regulator has observed more of these initiatives being implemented or considered by the banking industry.
"We see the need for a supervisory arrangement with greater flexibility to enable AIs to conduct more timely live tests of these initiatives before their formal launch. This will enable AIs to gather real-life data and user feedback on their new fintech products or services more easily in a controlled environment, so that they can make refinements to them as appropriate," said Yuen.
AIs will be allowed to, within the FSS, conduct trials of their initiatives with actual banking services and a limited number of participating customers such as staff members or focus groups of selected customers.
Non-Compliance
Within the sandbox, AIs will not have to fully comply with the HKMA's supervisory requirements during the trial period. This is similar to what the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has proposed. Singapore's consultation paper on the matter closed on July 8, the results of which are expected in early October this year.
Among the HKMA's requirements for initiatives in the FSS is that AIs clearly define the scope and phases of the trial. Also, adequate measures should be implemented to protect the interests of customers during the trial.
Yuen said these would include a proper process for selecting customers that understand the associated risks and voluntarily join the trial, enhanced complaint handling procedures, a mechanism for timely and fair compensation of customers' financial losses caused by any failures of the trial, and appropriate arrangements for customers to withdraw from the trial.
Risk management controls should also be implemented to address any risks posed by the trial run. The trial should also be subject to close monitoring if any significant problems or incidents arise. The HKMA stated that the FSS should not be used by AIs as "a means to bypass applicable supervisory requirements."
Yuen added that the regulator does not intend to stipulate an exhaustive list of the supervisory requirements that may potentially be relaxed within the FSS. "As the FSS is a new supervisory arrangement, the HKMA will refine the arrangement over time in light of the implementation experience and industry development," he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.