Icma Warns on Euro Clearing Relocation
Trade body says any forced move could increase risks and costs for derivatives users
The International Capital Market Association (Icma) included access to market infrastructure as one of several risks attached to the UK’s departure from the European Union (EU), in its quarterly report released on July 12.
“Mandatory relocation would involve costs and risks for users of capital markets,” said Icma in its report, going on to state that “relocation will cause market disruption, particularly if relocation is not properly organised over a sufficient period of time.”
The European Commission has put forward proposals stating that, due to the UK’s exit, European authorities need enhanced oversight over critical market infrastructures such as central counterparty (CCP) clearinghouses.
In extreme circumstances, EC vice president Valdis Dombrovskis said in a press conference on June 13, the EU could require CCPs that handle significant clearing in euro-denominated instruments to be physically located within the EU.
The proposals have met with a dim response from the industry, which has warned that any relocation could increase initial margin costs by up to 30 percent. Icma further warned that a relocation policy could have a knock-on effect in areas such as repo trading, and not just in derivatives.
“CCP clearing is also important for European repo business, the majority of the volume of which is voluntarily CCP-cleared, and the European repo/collateral market will be impacted in case there is a significant increase in aggregate margining requirements as a result of changes to the CCP clearing of derivatives,” Icma said.
However, forced relocation is likely to be a difficult proposition, even in a best-case scenario. WatersTechnology reported on June 29 that some market observers do not believe the EC would, in fact, pull the trigger on forcing a CCP to move.
“It seems pretty clear to me and a whole bunch of other people that the concept of relocating clearing was a great thing to say, and a great thing to get lathered up about in a Brexit context, but is actually pretty meaningless because you can’t just pick something physically up and move it,” said Steve Grob, director of group strategy at technology vendor Fidessa. “It’s like saying ‘I’m going to pick up Silicon Valley and put it in Detroit.’ Easy words, but what does that actually mean?”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.