IHS Markit Revs Alt Dataset of Auto Sales, Production Data
The automotive dataset is the first of many predictive offerings planned that leverage existing data assets from the former IHS business for use by systematic investors.
IHS Markit has released a new set of stock selection and strategy signals for the automotive industry that provides a suite of “alternative” datasets for traders and analysts following the sector, based on data collected by the IHS business prior to its merger with Markit, originally for use outside the financial industry.
The data—developed by the Research Signals service within IHS Markit’s equities data and analytics group—comprises 32 factors covering more than 30 auto manufacturers from around the globe, with more than 10 years of historical data. The factors include data on sales, production, vehicle registration, manufacturing volumes, pricing and market share, as well as factors such as “electrification”—a firm’s move towards electric vehicle production—and plant utilization. The vendor collects the data from state and regional governments, vehicle manufacturers, and other industry sources.
Under market share, the vendor provides metrics for year-on-year change in production output, monthly trend in China market share, and monthly change in sales in a manufacturer’s dominant market. Under sales and revenue factors, the vendor provides monthly trend in estimated revenue, year-on-year change in estimated revenue, trend in three-month sales growth, three-month unit sales surprise, monthly trend in sales growth, unit sales surprise, year-on-year change in unit sales, and year-on-year change in US market share. Under production, the vendor providers year-on-year change in life cycle, plant utilization, monthly trend in production growth, and monthly change in electric ratio.
Users can access the data as a feed of scores, via a web-based research platform that allows them to dig into the underlying data and models, or via pre-packaged research reports.
Officials say the decision to release the automotive dataset followed an exercise conducted at the start of this year to identify potential datasets from among the legacy IHS content—which may have been used within their ow industries to support marketing and supply chain decisions—that had broader potential for use by financial firms to support investment decisions.
IHS Markit picked the automotive data as its first focus based in part on this exercise, because it felt the sector would provide the best initial results, and also because when it sought feedback from clients, the vendor found “a couple of funds that were looking specifically for data in this industry,” possibly motivated by market forces such as the timing of tariffs and the disruption of the industry by Tesla and other electric vehicle manufacturers, says Chris Hammond, executive director of Research Signals.
“We went out to a set of our systematic trading clients and asked for feedback on our hypothesis and approach. Some of the key feedback we were looking for was whether this was unique, and whether they would value it highly for their research—and the feedback has been very good,” says David Riehl, executive director of the equities data and analytics group.
While firms may be able to source the data themselves, these types of datasets are typically not structured well for use in quantitative strategies—for example, they may be unstructured, and may have limited historical data available.
“The value-add is that we’ve already done all the hard work of sourcing, maintaining, and creating research based on the data,” which involves capturing and structuring data held in different databases, combining that with forecasts and analyst documents, and mapping them to company identifiers, then using those to derive traditional thematic signals as well as proprietary specialty signals that can easily be used as a direct input to systematic traders’ algorithms, Riehl says. “People can take one of our models off the shelf and test it to see whether it can generate alpha for them on its own—maybe to supplement their proprietary models… or to test whether their own models are unique or differentiated.”
Beyond the automotive data, Riehl says there are a number of different initiatives at various stages of development throughout the vendor to leverage datasets from the former IHS business in products and services aimed squarely at the former Markit business’ financial clients.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.