Index and Benchmark Data Complexity and Costs Grow

peter-ellis-investit

Management of index data and benchmarks is getting more costly and complex, and will continue to do so, according to a survey of 32 investment management firms conducted by Investit, an independent research firm, and commissioned by benchmark pricing, index and economic data provider Rimes Technologies.

The cost of buying index data was cited by 85 percent of respondents as the biggest issue in data management, while 60 percent said customized and blended benchmarks are an important issue, according to Peter Ellis, a managing director at Investit.

"For portfolio managers to manage strategies effectively, they need a broader range of market data on investment desks, to tell them how well they are doing against their objectives," he says.

Looking specifically at costs, with the three main types of costs being licensing, staffing and technology, 93 percent of respondents say index data licenses are the largest cost, while 60 percent ranked technology as the lowest cost concern or next to lowest, adds Ellis.

Complexity will drive demand for index and benchmark data, according to Ellis, and the industry can expect continued growth of data. "There are more complex strategies that managers have to support," he says. "We have more diversification, and nervousness about exposure to single asset classes. There is significant growth in the number of complex investment strategies, which is driving an increase in the number of blended benchmarks."

Automation of operating platforms, or lack thereof, is another challenge in index data and benchmark data management, respondents say, with 60 percent of them collecting index data manually for alternative types of assets. Data collection and validation are the easiest areas to automate, and yield the greatest benefits, adds Ellis.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here