ING Leverages Graph Technology to Identify Suspicious Activity
The bank is developing its data analytics platform, Hunter, to better identify financial crime.
ING is adding graph technology to its data analytics platform, Hunter, to better detect suspicious activity in transactional data.
Graph technology is a method of storing data that shows the different relationships between data points. For instance, in financial services, analysts can use it to better understand connections between entities and products, which can help to detect anomalies. Annerie Vreugdenhil, chief innovation officer (CIO) of wholesale banking at ING, says new advancements in analytics and graph databases are helping banks such as ING keep pace with increasingly sophisticated financial criminals.
“We are now working on graph technology and working it into [Hunter] so that we can visualize the patterns that you see emerging from suspicious activities. That is very important, because so far, we have always been [a few steps] behind the actors,” Vreugdenhil says.
As financial crime operates on an international stage, bad actors can be difficult to keep track of. Vreugdenhil says criminals often move their operations to different territories where they believe they will have less regulatory scrutiny, or scrutiny from institutions. And in response, banks need to be able to follow and monitor these bad actors’ movements on a global scale.
“This graph technology that we are working on right now will help us to be closer to those new trends and the new [criminal] networks that are emerging, because you will simply see them and visualize them much faster,” Vreugdenhil says.
Graph databases improve the more data they ingest, and every new data point changes the network. Vreugdenhil takes Facebook as an example. When a user accepts your friend request on Facebook, this changes the network linked to your page, and the new friend’s profile and their friends list will be mapped to your account.
“This is the way we are mapping the data using graph technology, so that we can see networks emerging, especially in anti-money laundering,” Vreugdenhil says. “This is very important, because if you find a suspicious transaction, [at one point in the network] and you flag it, it will have a different effect on the relationships.”
Visualization is a key part of ING’s graph-based approach. Vreugdenhil says graph technologies help its financial crime team make better informed decisions even if there are some missing data points in the network. However, there is no substitute for full comprehensive data, and the more data points, she adds, the more relationships that can be established.
This technology [graph tech] that we are working on right now will help us to be closer to those new trends and the new [criminal] networks that are emerging
Annerie Vreugdenhil, ING
The ING analytics platform is designed to analyze 14 billion transactions in a matter of seconds. The solution has been fully operational from early this year, but the bank is continuing to develop out its analytics models and tools for its financial crime investigations teams.
“We were actually able to create our first Hunter models in weeks on top of the technology [the analytics platform],” Vreugdenhil says. “Because we had loads of payments data, [our] data scientists were very quickly able to create a model and put it to work on this platform, and we have started adding graph technology to it.”
The bank hopes to have the technology incorporated into the new models by the end of the year.
ING is currently using the platform for its own transaction monitoring, but Vreugdenhil says banks could become better at targeting bad actors on a global scale if they collaborated and combined their data sets. However, this is challenging to achieve in practice as institutions are obligated to comply with data privacy regimes such as the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe, and protect client data.
Industry efforts to create more cooperation in this area do exist. ING is part of an initiative among Dutch banks called Transaction Monitoring Netherlands, including ABN Amro, Rabobank, Triodos Bank and De Volksbank. The group of firms announced a joint venture this summer to develop a utility platform to combat AML and financial terrorism. But data sharing between banks requires legislative changes to avoid breaching rules like GDPR. Some have gone so far as to call for the wholesale reform of financial crime regimes.
“So, this is one of the big debates that I know that a lot of banks are talking to governments and regulators about…It is not just about technology and modelling, it is really also about the whole system, and how do you make it work better,” she says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.