Instrument Classification Challenges Spark Call for Standards Review
Messaging standard ISO 20022 may help improve the system for accurately classifying financial instruments, according to a speaker at the International Securities Association for Institutional Trade Communication (ISITC) Europe quarterly meeting in London on July 15.
In relation to the management and timely maintenance of classifications, London-based Martin Sexton, consultant at London Market Systems, said one of the options worth exploring is to manage instrument classifications in the ISO 20022 repository.
“The repository contains hundreds of code lists and, at the end of the day, a classification is merely a code list, albeit with structure,” he said.
The question is if the existing Classification of Financial Instrument (CFI) standard, ISO 10962, can be used as a starting point, or if there is a need to develop a new standard.
London-based Paul Kennedy, business manager, reference data, Interactive Data and audience member at the ISITC meeting, questioned whether the industry should look to the CFI standard to try to overcome the global instrument classification challenges the industry faces today.
“The CFI would have to evolve from where it is today, as in its current mode it has not been deployed universally. Perhaps a redesign of the CFI standard within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) could be the more appropriate way forward,” said Kennedy.
Sexton said the current CFI standard, made up of six characters, lacks granularity, and would not be fit for purpose.
Speakers said the variations between different versions of the standard continue to cause complications, and some questioned how much longer the industry will be willing to put up with challenges related to using the current system before developing a new standard.
“It could be better to go for a classification with specific requirements clearly defined. I believe we have to go back to basics, look at the requirements,” said Sexton.
Many organizations have already created classifications internally and these are all fairly similar, he said, adding that it may just be about consolidating those efforts and moving forward from there, he explained.
Meanwhile, discussions around whether the existing Classification of Financial Instrument standard, ISO 10962, is fit for purpose are not new. Earlier this year, the EDM Council announced it was aiming to compile a list of requirements for the code to send to the ISO, following concerns from members that the revised version of the code will be complex to use (Inside Reference Data, April 2010).
Carla Mangado
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.