Internal Client Requirements Remain Top Driver of EDM Programs, Say Speakers
The main drivers for enterprise data management (EDM) programs continue to be meeting business requirements despite the increased pressure from regulators to improve transparency and mitigate risk, according to a panel of speakers at the Headstrong and EDM Council event in London yesterday.
Consultancy firm Headstrong and industry association EDM Council have completed a data management industry benchmarking survey, and the results, presented at the event, showed that the three top drivers for EDM activities are risk management and compliance, responding to client requirements and operational efficiency.
Regulatory requirements were the fourth biggest driver, and it was questioned whether these results would have been different had the survey been conducted later in the year. Mike Atkin, managing director, EDM Council, said regulation could be seen to reinforce the business case.
Julia Sutton, director, reference data services, RBC Capital Markets, said the data management team is now partnering more closely with other areas within the business. "We're part of these conversations with compliance and risk," she said.
Yet, although there is a growing regulatory focus on data management, panelists stressed that data management drivers go beyond meeting regulatory requirements. Rohit Mathur, head, enterprise data services, Headstrong, suggested it seems as though the importance of internal clients will not change.
Regulation might strengthen the business case, but it is not necessarily the primary driver. Peter Serenita, global head of data management, COBAM, HSBC, said there are still drivers other than regulation, and the internal drivers for data management programs are so strong. "I really believe the best data management programs are the ones that are internally driven," he said.
In fact, meeting regulatory requirements can be done as part of other programs. Nick Skinner, head of strategy, global data management, Northern Trust, said: "If we have the right program in place today, we can accommodate these [regulatory] changes fairly easily."
Lorraine Waters, global head of reference data, RBS Global Banking and Markets, said the Headstrong and EDM Council report could be viewed as a competitor analysis survey. "Part of the reason I participated was to understand where my firm was [compared to other organizations]," she said.
The main goal continues to be optimizing data management processes whether it is to facilitate regulatory or internal requirements. Tom Dalglish, chief information architect, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said: "We've spent a lot of time selling the idea. Now we have to make it happen."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.