ISDA Deploys Reporting Blueprint for Derivatives Markets
ISDA's Common Domain Model (CDM. 2.0) aims to standarize regulatory reporting and bring greater automation to derivatives trading.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has announced the deployment of its Common Domain Model (CDM. 2.0) to support financial institutions’ test phase two of the digital regulatory reporting (DRR) pilot for derivatives.
The DRR is a project the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Bank of England have been working on to explore the use of technology in helping firms comply with regulation and improve the quality of information reported. One stream of it, which ISDA is now involved in, is to explore that idea for derivatives markets, looking at ways to report as outlined by regulations like the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II) digitally in a more coherent and centralized way.
The ISDA CDM has been developed in response to regulation and high costs associated with manual processes. One of the problems with the growing number of regulations has been the variety of interpretations of how to provide complex datasets.
“When a developer has to build a system to get information from a trading system to the regulator via a trade repository, the developers make decisions about what the field or value should be,” says Ian Sloyan, director, market infrastructure and technology, at ISDA. “If we can produce that as code that can operate on the same data and in the same format, hopefully we remove some of the interpretation risk that exists today from institution to institution.”
ISDA has worked on CDM for two years with input from buy-side and sell-side firms and technology providers. Phase two of the DRR began early this year. Other participants in the pilot include Barclays, Credit Suisse, HSBC, NatWest, Santander and Lloyds.
There are a number of benefits of having a formal central representation for regulatory reporting. “Every bank has its own implementation of Mifid II and EMIR,” says Sloyan. “We want to provide a more formal representation of that implementation that can be transparently shared and centralized. Then we can go to the regulators and say, ‘This is what we have put together for EMIR and Mifid; does this match with what you would like to see?’ It is also easy to centrally update the reporting model and say, ‘Actually, the way we have reported this field for this product should be adjusted slightly.’ That is the kind of future state that we are exploring now to see if that is helpful.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.