JP Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM) has changed the way it handles international orders for buy-side firms trading in and out of Taiwan’s markets.
Since going live in 2018, JPMAM has routed trading for all Taiwanese securities from portfolios sitting outside of Taiwan through its Taiwanese Center of Excellence. Orders for non-Taiwanese securities from the Taiwanese desk are routed directly to JPMAM’s existing global hubs for execution.
The number of orders sent to Taiwan for execution by JPMAM’s global teams has gone up 65% since this initiative went live.
For example, previously, if portfolio managers globally put in an order for Taiwanese securities, it would have to be reproduced by the local desk in Taiwan. Rather than reproducing those orders locally, JPMAM can now send all orders for Taiwanese securities for portfolios globally directly to the Taiwanese desk. In addition to Taiwan, it has centers in Hong Kong, New York, and London.
By doing this, JPMAM leverages more of the local expertise and talents of each desk, says Lee Bray, head of trading in Asia-Pacific at JP Morgan.
As a result of the change, JPMAM’s percentage of average daily volume (ADV), which measures the order size compared to ADV in a given stock, showed an increase for Taiwanese equities from 6.2% in the second quarter of 2018 to 53.9% in the fourth quarter of 2018.
The number of orders sent to Taiwan for execution by JPMAM’s global teams has gone up 65% since this initiative went live.
Trading activity for Taiwan-domiciled accounts can now be aggregated and traded in block orders, which has also led to slippage on Taiwan accounts decreasing over a quarter by five basis points for offshore markets and by 40 basis points for accounts outside Taiwan investing in Taiwanese stocks in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Bray says the Taiwanese Center of Excellence is part of an initiative by JPMAM to upgrade and harmonize its internal systems.
He explains that JP Morgan invests significantly in technology, and since he joined in 2013, JPMAM has been harmonizing its global systems. “So when it actually came down to changing the back-end processes within our trading system, it was very easy for us to do,” he says.
Now the Taiwanese desk runs on the same system as JPMAM’s desks in the region.
He says it was a matter of putting specific rules in place for the system to understand where to execute certain orders.
“For technical reasons, if you have a lot of different systems, they become slightly more difficult because given that we’ve got—for the most part—a system that everybody is on, it makes it a lot easier than it would be if we had all different systems, from a trading perspective,” he adds.
- READ MORE: Warrants Issuers Battle Algo Predators in Hong Kong: The threat of high-frequency traders have forced banks to spend big on tech. Click here to read more.
Before JPMAM could put this in place for its Taiwanese desk, it had to get the all-clear from Taiwanese regulators. Morgan Chang, head of Taiwanese trading at JPMAM, says the project was initiated in 2015 and the regulators concluded that it would be better to have an open conversation with other asset managers in the country.
Chang says the project is part of a commitment made to Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) to build out businesses in the city-state within an official program called the Deep Cultivation Plan.
The plan, initiated by the FSC in 2013, conducts annual reviews of foreign asset managers, including evaluating the cultivation of local talent. In return, fund managers benefit in the form of permits that allow them to introduce new types of funds and submit more products for approval at one time.
“Initially, we raised this to regulators, who think this is good for the whole industry. So, I then went to the Securities Investment Trust and Consulting Association (Sitca), Taiwan’s asset management industry body, and gave a presentation to the members there and reached conclusions. Eventually, we filed the presentation to regulators,” says Chang.
Bray says JPMAM will continue working with Taiwan’s regulators to improve some of the workflows within the firm as well as to increase the visibility of the Taiwanese market.
“It works both ways, as we could leverage the expertise of [the] local trading desk, who obviously are experts in the Taiwanese market and the rest of the world’s expertise—for example, the trades in Hong Kong would then flow from Taiwan to Hong Kong,” adds Bray.
He sees the trend of setting out local trading desks not only changing JPMAM’s internal processes, but global asset management firms of similar scale. “It’s a global trend to have more consistent approaches to how asset management does things,” he says.
With additional reporting by Kate Lin.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.