MackeyRMS Launches ESG Scorecard

Ratings toolkit includes features to help investment teams grade securities and funds to meet sustainability mandates.

fund-growth

Research management software provider MackeyRMS is launching ESG Scorecards, a toolkit to improve investment selection, monitoring, and reporting in environmental, social, and governance-focused portfolios. The scorecards are designed to help investment teams grade securities and funds before inclusion in client portfolios, as well as to monitor existing portfolios.

Portfolio managers and analysts can use the scorecards to monitor the ESG status of portfolio holdings in real time, and report details of their selection and monitoring process to internal and external stakeholders. “Users will have a single scorecard, and that scorecard will allow you to configure and rate your metadata based on each of the three columns of E, S, and G as you see fit,” says Will Keuper, vice president and head of product at MackeyRMS.

Over the past few years, ESG funds have come to represent an unmissable marketing opportunity for many investment firms. Data from research firm Morningstar shows that firms are rebranding existing funds to reflect sustainability objectives. In the second quarter of this year, 40 European funds were repurposed in this way, according to Morningstar, including BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure, previously known as BNP Paribas Easy NMX 30 Infrastructure Global, and Metropolitan Rentastro Growth, which is now Metropolitan Rentastro Sustainable Growth.

At the same time, investment flows into ESG funds are increasing. The Morningstar research shows assets in European sustainable funds rose to an all-time high of $870 billion in Q2 2020, a 20% increase from Q1. Globally, a record $71.1 billion of cash flowed into sustainable funds in Q2. These funds now hold more than $1 trillion in assets under management.

Faced with this trend, asset managers are trying to understand how to truly integrate ESG considerations into their investment strategies. Firms say that while third-party ESG ratings provide a good basis for research, analysts must delve much deeper for true insights into the companies and sectors they cover. This has led many asset managers to build their own proprietary datasets and look to alternative data, quant strategies and new metrics for impact investing.

Keuper says individual funds will have developed their own unique processes for ingesting and aggregating ESG data, so MackeyRMS designed the ESG Scorecards so that each fund can integrate its own ratings into the platform. Users can then view real-time ESG status updates for all portfolio holdings within whatever research dashboard the investment firm uses.

Ratings on the ESG Scorecards can be accessed through a regular browser and mobile apps for iPhone and Android, while third-party data is consumed via a two-way API.

The toolkit includes a function to publish in-app notes and descriptions of the ESG status of portfolio holdings to outline next steps and ensure the status is maintained. Companies that are yet to qualify for inclusion in ESG portfolios can be tracked according to key criteria.

Within the scorecards, ratings can be drawn from each of the three ESG pillars. These scores can be viewed individually or funnelled into an overall ESG score for an entire company.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here