May 2017: Don’t Put All Your ESGs in One Basket
Max summarizes the highlights of the May issue of Inside Data Management.
ESG is one factor to consider in investment decisions, as is the growing alternative data space, which we revisit this month—this time from the point of view of quantitative traders and investment managers—courtesy of Risk magazine’s Faye Kilburn. Despite predictions of massive increases in spend on alternative data, many efforts to date have proved costly failures due to the complexity of not just handling the unstructured datasets, but being able to eke out consistent returns. Ironically, that’s exactly how some quants like it—or at least, so they profess: the harder and more expensive it is to harness this data, the less likely their competitors will be to attempt it, and the dataset will continue to deliver profits for longer, instead of everyone piling in at once, eliminating any advantage.
The impact of systematic investors’ activity on markets is also evident elsewhere in this issue of Inside Data Management: Quantitative traders at Morgan Stanley spotted strange modal activity in data from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, which suggests high-frequency trading activity is actually changing market microstructures. And in a separate article, Dan DeFrancesco analyzes how three US stock exchanges plan to introduce artificial delays to their data and order-routing infrastructures in response to IEX’s exchange approval. IEX uses a “magic shoebox” of spooled fiber to introduce a 350-microsecond delay to eliminate latency disparities between different market participants. By implementing similar offerings, NYSE, Nasdaq and the Chicago Stock Exchange hope to negate IEX’s main differentiating factor.
These trading innovations could not have been possible without significant automation across the trading infrastructure that connects firms and markets. But some other areas within financial firms struggle with automation issues. Focusing on changes coming out of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Wei-Shen Wong reports on how the increasing regulatory burden has the potential to drive greater levels of automation around these functions, and how firms may flounder if they attempt to handle new-world regulatory requirements using old-school techniques—a sentiment that could equally be applied to any business function across today’s markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.