May 2017: Don’t Put All Your ESGs in One Basket

Max summarizes the highlights of the May issue of Inside Data Management.

max-bowie

ESG is one factor to consider in investment decisions, as is the growing alternative data space, which we revisit this month—this time from the point of view of quantitative traders and investment managers—courtesy of Risk magazine’s Faye Kilburn. Despite predictions of massive increases in spend on alternative data, many efforts to date have proved costly failures due to the complexity of not just handling the unstructured datasets, but being able to eke out consistent returns. Ironically, that’s exactly how some quants like it—or at least, so they profess: the harder and more expensive it is to harness this data, the less likely their competitors will be to attempt it, and the dataset will continue to deliver profits for longer, instead of everyone piling in at once, eliminating any advantage.

The impact of systematic investors’ activity on markets is also evident elsewhere in this issue of Inside Data Management: Quantitative traders at Morgan Stanley spotted strange modal activity in data from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, which suggests high-frequency trading activity is actually changing market microstructures. And in a separate article, Dan DeFrancesco analyzes how three US stock exchanges plan to introduce artificial delays to their data and order-routing infrastructures in response to IEX’s exchange approval. IEX uses a “magic shoebox” of spooled fiber to introduce a 350-microsecond delay to eliminate latency disparities between different market participants. By implementing similar offerings, NYSE, Nasdaq and the Chicago Stock Exchange hope to negate IEX’s main differentiating factor.

These trading innovations could not have been possible without significant automation across the trading infrastructure that connects firms and markets. But some other areas within financial firms struggle with automation issues. Focusing on changes coming out of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Wei-Shen Wong reports on how the increasing regulatory burden has the potential to drive greater levels of automation around these functions, and how firms may flounder if they attempt to handle new-world regulatory requirements using old-school techniques—a sentiment that could equally be applied to any business function across today’s markets. 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here