Metamako Cements Firewall for Low-Latency Data Filtering, Logging

MetaProtect Firewall targets customers seeking a layer of security that also meets ultra-low-latency and high-port-density needs.

shutterstock-134740778

Metamako founder and CTO Dave Snowdon says the vendor is seeing demand from exchanges, banks, trading firms and customers outside the financial industry that need a security layer between themselves and the exchange, or different security layers between their clients.

“They don’t need the heavyweight firewalls. They need something simple that can satisfy their low latency and deterministic requirements,” he says, adding that in fact, many customers don’t use the features provided by heavyweight firewalls, and are instead simply looking for a solution that simply implements a set of rules and ensures that packets are addressed to the right place. “They are not turned on, so the functionality is almost the same.”

The MetaProtect Firewall has a high port density of 48 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and 32 firewall filters, performs packet filtering in 130 to 155 nanoseconds, and provides logging capabilities for those filters. It offers flexible configuration, including the ability to specify ports that do not need filtering. In those cases, packets pass through the firewall in just five nanoseconds. 

Vendor officials say the solution is ideal for situations where a firewall solution is mandatory, and where ultra-low latency and high port density is required. For example, the Korea Exchange requires that brokers must own and manage a firewall between a client’s trading servers and the exchange. This became a concern for trading participants due to the latency penalty the requirement introduces.

“There has to be a firewall between that gateway and between third parties, which protects the gateway against potentially malicious acts,” Snowdon says, adding that MetaProtect has helped brokers to improve that exchange-facing architecture.

MetaProtect took about nine months to build, in parallel with other projects—though the vendor was able to reuse code used in previous infrastructure projects—and has spent two months in testing with several clients, he says.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here