NASD Asks SEC To Delay Move To Decimalization; SIA Releases Survey
DECIMALIZATION FOCUS
WASHINGTON, DC--The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) has asked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to consider delaying the implementation of decimalization until 2001.
The letter, which was sent to SEC chairman Arthur Levitt by NASD chairman and CEO Frank Zarb, underlines the NASD’s support for the project but warns the commission against moving too fast. "The prudent thing to do is implement decimals when we know we are ready. We are not there yet. Nasdaq has been growing faster than other markets, so it is logical that we are more sensitive to capacity issues. We will not put investors and the market at risk by forging ahead too soon. It is important that we do this right," Zarb states.
The recommendation comes amid growing concerns that securities firms won’t have enough time to be prepared for the sharp increase in data traffic by the July 3 deadline. In fact, decimalization is currently the primary focus of market data managers in North America and some industry observers say additional requests will be filed if the SEC turns down the NASD’s proposal.
SURVEY
Meanwhile, the Securities Industry Association (SIA), aided by TowerGroup, recently revealed the results of its survey of some 760 North American securities broker/dealers on all aspects of the move to decimal pricing.
The survey focused on key decimalization spending aspects, including redemption of information technology, expansion of capacity, systems testing, industry wide testing and implementation issues.
The results: North American brokerage firms will have spent approximately $907 million to implement decimal pricing in the US equity and option markets between October 1999 and the final completion date. This figure is a fraction of what securities firms are estimated to have spent for Y2K remediation ($6.07 billion) and is only $43 million below the $950 million companies are thought to have spent to facilitate the European Monetary Union.
The survey also found that securities firms will allocate the bulk of their expenditures to increasing their trading capacity.
SCALE OF JOB
Larger securities firms have accounted for approximately 75 percent of IT expenditures industry-wide. These firms are projected to spend disproportionately less on decimalization spending than on general technology. This is because they have recently made large investments to upgrade their technology infrastructures, increase capacity and enhance their straight through processing capabilities to expand their online distribution initiatives. Medium-sized firms, which have traditionally been slower to adopt new technologies, now have to catch up with the large firms.
Smaller firms, however, may not be as unduly burdened by the move to decimal pricing as larger firms, because their technology efforts will be supported by the corresponding clearing firms or their technology firms.
The survey also noted the impact of option trading and pricing on decimalization. Electronic pricing and multiple listings are two major drivers of this complexity. The increase in the number of market entry points magnifies the number of options quotes, as these prices are automatically generated for each price movement of the underlying stock.
CONCLUSION
The survey concludes that decimalization will force the industry to quote, trade and execute a rapidly expanding number of spreads that are smaller, lower-commission and narrower. Brokerage firms will need to adapt to this changed environment or be left behind.
Now that Y2K is behind the industry and more tangible volume estimates have been created, decimalization is looking much more extensive and expensive.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.