Nasdaq Adds Data to MFQS, Renames it Nasdaq Fund Network

Nasdaq has significantly expanded the content available via the 34 year-old MFQS feed, saying it will bring increased transparency to all the fund asset classes covered.

oliver-albers-nasdaq

Originally launched in 1984 to provide data on listed mutual funds and money market funds, MFQS now includes unit investment trusts, annuities, separately managed and unified managed accounts, collective investment trusts, alternative investments and structured products listed on Nasdaq.

“We see increasing demand for transparency around the world, especially in Asia. As the middle classes in China and other nations grow, the demand for data will continue to grow. As our recent partnership with Sina shows, new investors are coming online every day and we are there to support their needs,” says Oliver Albers, VP and head of strategic partnerships in Nasdaq’s Global Information Services division.

MFQS began as a US product, and the broad transparency it provided was a key factor in the growth and popularity of mutual funds with retail investors. With the relaunch as NFN, we are expanding our international coverage as well as the types of instruments we cover in order to reflect today’s retail investor interests,” Albers adds.

The service now distributes more than 35,000 investable products to more than a million investors daily.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here