New York Stock Exchange Proposes To Simplify Market Data Fees; Per-Location Charge Would Be Dropped
THIS MONTH'S LEAD STORIES
The New York Stock Exchange plans to dramatically simplify the fee schedule it uses to charge professionals for market data. The proposed schedule would eliminate some charges and consolidate others, leaving users with a flat per-terminal charge. Tom Haley, vice president, market data services, at the NYSE, will present the plan at the Thursday morning general session of the SIA show.
Haley declines to discuss details of the new plan, which has been unanimously endorsed "in concept" by the SIA Communications Committee. Several sources who have been briefed, however, say its basic points are these:
(1) It is revenue-neutral. The NYSE will get neither more nor less market data revenue as a result.
(2) It does away with the per-location charge by increasing slightly the per-device charge.
(3) It eliminates the cost differential between last sale only and last sale plus bid/ask prices. Last sale only will no longer be an option.
(4) It eliminates the charge for the low-speed ticker.
As a result, sources say, most firms will wind up paying about the same exchange fees as they do today, but at a considerable savings in administrative effort. No longer will it be necessary to track services on a tube-by-tube basis.
A minority of firms will win a little or lose a little as a result. Those with immense branches -- like Merrill Lynch -- will end up paying more because of the incremental per-device charge. Those with many small branches -- like Edward D. Jones -- will end up paying less because the per-location charge will be dropped. In addition, those firms that try to save money by restricting some terminals to last sale will have to pay up.
Haley does confirm the general outline of the plan: "If a brokerage firm has 50 devices, in one scenario all in one branch and in another scenario spread around in five branches, they're paying different effective rates today because of the location charge. In the future they will all be paying the same amount."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.