Panel: Regulatory Overhaul Pushing Firms to Tackle Data Challenges
Firms will have to tackle their data challenges immediately if they are going to be ready for the upcoming regulatory overhaul, according to panelists at the SunGard New York City Day in New York.
Speakers argued that the now fast-moving regulatory debates will inevitably impact the speed at which firms tackle their data challenges, forcing organizations to react quickly to ensure data is reconciled and auditable.
New York-based John Avery, partner, SunGard consulting services, said: "I think it all comes down to the data and the data challenges...whether you are an asset manager, hedge fund manager or a custodian, for example, clearly the need to provide cleaned reconciled data on a very frequent basis to your regulatory body is something the industry may ultimately have to deal with." From a technology and operations standpoint, this may be seen as a dramatic and unintended consequence of reform, he said.
Yet, while the current approaches to data and data technologies can still be challenging to some firms, according to Avery, the costs of compliance post-reform may be very dramatic.
Neil Palmer, partner, SunGard consulting services, said the data management vision some firms have has now become outdated. "We are moving to a scenario where you have all data everywhere all the time, and complexity is the new reality...I don't think we are going to be able to simplify our way out of what is happening with distributed systems and distributed data out there," he said, adding that it is not just the acceleration in the growth of data itself, but also acceleration in the growth of data sources, the number of participants, the complexity and intensity of interactions.
This could also mean there will be a need for changing procedures with new standards. "We are moving to more and more disparate and distributed systems where people are pushing data out that doesn't conform to a specific standard," said Palmer.
Regulatory change is also expected to push firms to further consider focusing on risk management and strategic planning, as well as looking into new asset classes while forcing them to pay greater attention to data management challenges enterprise-wide.
TowerGroup's research director Stephen Bruel said the regulatory requirements are changing the way people think about data and the needs of the business. "Firms now have to think differently, and consider having different processes in place. They have realized when attempting to comply with the stress test mandates that the data processes, risk processes and even decision-making processes they were relying on were not accurate," said Bruel.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.