Program Trade Reporting Talks Launched By SEC
THIS WEEK'S LEAD STORIES
The Securities and Exchange Commission called a meeting in Washington D.C. Sept. 7 to get vendor input on the issue of intra-day program trade reporting.
The meeting, attended by representatives of major quote vendors and price reporting authorities, followed similar pulse-taking sessions with groups of broker/dealer and exchange officials.
Someone at the SEC believes that keeping the public regularly informed of the degree of program trading activity will help restore retail investor confidence. The more information, the better, seems to be the theme.
While some observers believe intra-day program trade reporting may be counterproductive, others say such information could be useful to retail brokers seeking to encourage reluctant investors.
Swimmers won't be encouraged by regular shark alerts. But those determined to test the waters will certainly want to know when and where the sharks are feeding.
Not that program trade reporting would lack meaning for professional traders; once available, program trade statistics will doubtless contribute to still more complex software-driven strategies.
The reporting mechanism discussed during the meetings would call for broker/dealers to tag their orders, either upon entry or retroactively. The Securities Industry Automation Corp., through the Consolidated Tape Authority, would be responsible for collecting, processing and transmitting the data to vendors.
The SEC would like to inform investors on a timely basis -- say every half-hour or so -- of the volume of program trading in any particular stock, index, or market.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to implementation of such a plan is the definition of program trading. SEC officials concede there is no such consensus, but suggest that some of the necessary or reasonable characteristics might include: elapsed time between execution of the various legs of the program, a minimum number of shares, stocks or dollars, and a relationship to an index.
Unfortunately, one of the key characteristics determining the nature of a trade is its assigned role in a trading strategy. How else can one distinguish between a hedge taken in connection with a customer order and one leg of a stock index futures arbitrage?
SEC officials say broker-dealers also expressed concerns related to the timeliness and detail of the proposed reporting. Broker-dealers don't want trading strategies broadcast while they're still underway. Nor do they want program activity attributed to individual firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.