Regulatory Uncertainty Hinders AI Innovation
Firms are reluctant to move ahead with AI technologies as there is little regulatory guidance on its ethical implications, exchange providers say.
A lack of regulatory certainty around the ethical implications of black box artificial intelligence (AI) is holding back innovation at financial firms and market infrastructure providers, exchange providers said yesterday.
Firms are nervous about implementing any technology or strategies that could clash with social policy, said John Pigott, founder and CEO of ABE Global, a security token exchange that was launched this year.
There are few ethical concerns surrounding the use of algorithmic trading strategies, perhaps, but ”there is a very big qualitative gap when you start using AI technologies in terms of determining access to capital,” Pigott said.
Pigott was speaking on a panel at the Extent conference, hosted by Exactpro in London on September 17.
“You suddenly have social policies getting in there—who gets a credit card, who gets a stock transfer? And if you don’t have some ability to come in and explain how that engine is working, then there is an inherent clash with social policies,” Pigott said.
Public concern is growing around the ethical use of AI as these technologies proliferate. In the capital markets context, governments and financial firms are beginning to grapple with ethical and systemic risk implications of AI, with both public and private sector companies setting up their own committees and working groups to consider future policy and implement ethical AI programs.
These debates often hinge on the transparency into an algorithm, particularly when it comes to deep learning neural networks, which are widely used in many industries and are especially obscure.
“Any time you are going to go black box … that probably works fine for an individual trade, but when it comes to capital access, when there is any public interest involved, there is a bright line that a number of firms are not willing to cross because regulatory guidance is lacking,” Pigott said.
Black box algorithms, however, are the most complex and capable, and therefore where users will find the most advantage in the capital markets.
“Black box has superior capabilities,” said Mario Quonils, CTO of the London Metal Exchange.
The LME has actively trialed AI in a market surveillance context.
Quonils said he has been involved in discussions with academics, who have concluded that a deep learning structure would have to have nine layers to be truly useful for market participants. Deep learning is made up of layers of stacked neural networks.
“Nine different layers! That is nine angles that any one individual would need to understand, that they would need to be able to compute. That makes it maybe 1.05% of humanity that could have that vision. … To what degree is it then ethical? Is this prescribed behavior?” Quonils said.
The opacity and complexity of these networks are therefore a risk, he added, and regulators do not like risk. “As such, that is where we will have some issues to push this [technology] forward.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.