Sears: Euro Consolidated Tape Won't "Just Happen"
Speaking at the Mifid Forum in London yesterday, Guy Sears, director of wholesale at the Investment Management Association (IMA), delivered an illuminating address on the upcoming Mifid review.
"Mifid is an important directive for the buy side, but perhaps not the most important," he joked.
Commenting on the consolidated tape, a key aspect of the review which would allow for real-time reporting of prices and volumes of all stocks listed on a trading venue, Sears expressed his disappointment that previous calls from the buy side for a solution were not heeded by the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA).
"Three years ago, we raised this with a senior member of the FSA. The things we asked for in that meeting and the follow up letter, are exactly what is being asking for now, almost three years on. We don't think people listened," he said.
Addressing whether the development of a consolidated tape will be market-led, Sears was cutting, pointing to the fact that in an industry where all parties are "quite rightly" concerned with their own business, it will be extremely difficult to get a solution.
"Frankly, the industry has missed the train - we're not going to just ‘get' a consolidated tape. Unless they're foolish, powers will be taken by the European Commission to mandate this."
"I Just Don't Care"
Although a consolidated tape was of interest to Sears, other features of the Mifid review were not so lucky - in particular, discussions over the exact percentage of trades being executed on MTFs and dark pools.
"Forty percent, thirty-eight percent, five percent, I just don't care. I don't care because securing a figure doesn't correlate to any need of investors," he said.
"When selecting venues the buy side cares about liquidity, cost and resilience to shocks," said Sears. "Which is why it's no good telling us to go onto a transparent market if there's less liquidity."
Drawing his candid speech to a close, Sears was tongue-in-cheek about buy-side expectations of the Mifid review. "What does the buy side want? Well, we want to have our cake and eat it and we're hopeful that the Mifid review will give us that."
BST Analysis
The Mifid review meeting, hosted at Bloomberg's UK offices on Dec.1, was run by the Mifid Forum, a joint working group, formed to allow market participants to evaluate the business and technology impacts of Mifid. Discussions on the day focussed on auditing, compliance and regulation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.