Sepa and the Reference Data Revolution
With the Single European Payments Area (Sepa) directive fast approaching, financial institutions are looking to rapidly implement new solutions and reference data management processes to meet its requirements and ensure the smooth running of payments within the eurozone.
Sepa aims to put in place a transparent payments process whereby cross-border payments operate on a comparative level to those made within national borders. This would remove the wide disparities between payments service levels that are currently experienced and significantly reduce cross-border transaction costs within the area.
Reference Data at the Point of Transaction
While the directive does not fully come into force until 2010, financial institutions need to act now to put processes in place to meet its requirements. From January 2008, all financial institutions making cross-border payments within the Sepa have to be armed with the beneficiary's International Bank Account Number (IBAN) and Bank Identifier Code (BIC). As a consequence of these requirements, banks also need to be able to access Swift-enabled routing BICs (which may or may not be the same as the BIC provided by the client). If banks are unable to check the IBAN against the identifying BIC and the Swift-enabled routing BIC at the point of transaction, they will not be able to guarantee the cost of the transaction, the transfer cycle or whether the transfer will be effected at all.
It is estimated that more than 2,000 banks within the Sepa do not have BICs, and around 4,000 banks only have identifying (non-Swift-enabled) BICs. Therefore, approximately 6,000 banks within Sepa are not connected to Swift and do not have a Swift-enabled routing BIC. Although these banks tend to be the smaller banks and will therefore represent a lower percentage of payments, they are bound to create the maximum headache for Sepa implementation.
Smaller banks pose a challenge on two levels:
1. The larger banks need to know their routing BICs in order to effect payments to them, but the smaller banks have limited publishing facilities and budgets for advertising these details.
2. To service their own clients' needs, smaller banks should invest in an improved IT and reference data infrastructure, but they will typically have budget constraints here as well.
The Complex World of Reference Data
The world of reference data is rapidly changing. In addition to Sepa, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), Basel II, KYC and AML, among others, are all affecting operations and demands for new reference data sources. Reference data was once peripheral to banks' activities, however, Sepa has made it a compliance issue and therefore pushed it to the forefront. Sepa is acting as a catalyst for change, representing a significant opportunity for the industry to achieve straight-through processing of payments and significantly reduce cross-border transaction costs within the eurozone.
Outsourcing Reference Data
As reference data management becomes more complicated, financial institutions will increasingly look to outsource their reference data needs. Outsourcing can remove the need for financial institutions to commit valuable time and resources to the task of sourcing, verifying, validating, normalizing and updating the high volumes of data required for secure and accurate cross-border cash payments. Outsourced reference data companies are able to work in partnership with information technology solution providers to ensure the latest offerings take full advantage of the reference data available.
Investment in Software
However, accessing correct and comprehensive reference data is not enough. In order to introduce Sepa-compliant systems, banks must invest in IT. This is far from straightforward as reference data needs to be delivered with the specified content, format and delivery channel to existing systems and the data then integrated with those systems. The numerous legacy systems that exist further complicate this process.
While there is no quick fix for Sepa compliance, the ability to access correct, comprehensive reference data at the point of transaction is key to meeting the directive's requirements.
Financial institutions that act now will not only meet their regulatory obligations, but also ensure the secure and timely completion of transactions, and minimise error rates and transaction costs.
A number of solution providers are offering new solutions and system upgrades that replace or sit on top of legacy systems. As the pressure to comply with the Sepa mounts, there is likely to be an element of 'panic buying' of Sepa-compliant solutions within the directive's timeframe. Indeed, smaller banks may well find that this is the catalyst that pushes them to completely outsource their payments processing.
Ian Dunning is managing director of CB.Net, a provider of payments reference data management systems
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.