SteelEye Unveils Tool to Slash Trade Reconstruction Timeframes
Officials say the new product will enable firms to aggregate and correlate the data required to fulfill trade reconstruction obligations within seconds.
London-based regtech provider SteelEye has rolled out an Auto-Trade Reconstruction tool that aggregates all structured and unstructured data relevant to a transaction, to help firms meet the compliance requirements and timeframes of regulatory reporting obligations.
The vendor originally planned to release Auto-Trade Reconstruction in the first quarter of this year, but delayed the launch until now after the Covid-19 outbreak, to focus on meeting demand for its existing services around trade surveillance and compliance.
The tool—which is automatically available to all clients of SteelEye’s Trade Surveillance product, a software-as-a-service platform that can be fully managed or deployed in a client’s own Amazon cloud—captures data such as trade and order activity, chat conversations and phone calls, tweets, emails, and meeting minutes to create a full view of any communication and activity relating to a trade or security. Dodd-Frank in the US, Mifid II in Europe, and the UK’s Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) all have provisions whereby regulators can demand all records relating to a transaction or series of trades. Dodd-Frank, for example, requires this data to be produced within 72 hours.
Given the breadth and complexity of data points and interconnections that must be captured and monitored, being able to collect and present the data to regulators within their specified timeframes has proved to be a challenge for many firms, says SteelEye CEO Matt Smith (pictured).
“Just getting the data together that’s needed to achieve reconstruction is a hugely-complicated feat—let alone connecting it all,” Smith says. “But the way we built SteelEye was to focus on bringing data together. SteelEye is effectively a data platform that aggregates unstructured data, such as emails, Slack conversations, voice, news, social media, order and trade data—we support more than 120 trade and order management platforms—as well as CRM data for companies and the people within them, counterparty data, employee data—such as from PeopleSoft or Microsoft Active Directorya—and more than 150 million instrument reference data points and market data from several major vendors.”
The vendor then uses artificial intelligence and supervised machine learning that is trained to make the correct associations between securities and other data in order to reconstruct any information relating to a trade. As a result, SteelEye is able to shorten the time required to produce trade reconstruction reports from days to “seconds,” Smith says.
“A firm wants to know every time within a set timeframe when someone references a security linked to a transaction,” he says. “You’re looking at transactions, human behavior, market movements, news, and everything else to find out what did your firm know, what did individuals within—and outside—your firm know, and what was going on in the market. It gives clients the ability at any point to say ‘Show me everything for the past 24 or 48 hours about a specific stock and an individual or trader,’ and then we show them that, together with news and trading activity.”
From Compliance to Competitive Advantage
Once a client has the data points required for trade reconstruction assembled and correlated, they could also use that to create additional value. Smith declines to detail any specific ways clients are using the data to gain a competitive advantage, but says that any firm could feed the results into their risk engine, or use it to run P&L reports to gain a more accurate overview of their activity.
“Why not use a solution originally developed for regulatory compliance to gain more commercial benefits?” he says, warning that you can’t expect to gain any advantage from data unless you have already invested time and effort in cleansing and structuring the data. “Unless you spend time looking at your data, you won’t be able to address these challenges. If you do, you can use data in ways you’ve never done before. But if you don’t get the data right, forget it.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.