Swift Develops API to Automate KYC Registry Data Consumption
The API was recently made available to all registry customers, with plans to offer a 'proactive API' next year to push new and updated data.
Swift has developed an API to automate its KYC Registry, with the aim of creating time efficiencies, particularly for large institutions.
Marie-Charlotte Henseval, head of KYC compliance services at Swift, says the API enables banks that consume information from the platform to automate and integrate that data directly into their back-office systems.
“Customers can use the API to automatically schedule the download of a correspondent bank’s KYC profile. The data can then be stored directly into the customer’s database and used to populate any data fields in the customer’s client management applications,” Henseval says. “The API eliminates the manual effort of logging into the KYC Registry, searching for a correspondent’s KYC profile, opening it, downloading it and then storing it in a central place for further processing.”
She says all the customer has to do is instruct its API to download a certain dataset and store it in a pre-selected place. “The time savings, particularly for large institutions, are significant,” she says.
The API offered by the KYC Registry is, at the moment, reactive. In 2020, we intend to offer a proactive API, which will proactively push new or updated KYC data to its customers.
Marie-Charlotte Henseval, Swift
According to Henseval, the development of the API was completed in March 2019. From March to May, Swift tested and fine-tuned the interface, along with representative banks from its user group. In June, the API was made available to all KYC Registry customers.
The registry, launched in December 2014 and hosted on Swift’s server in Belgium, is a central repository where institutions upload and manage their due diligence information in a standardized way.
The idea is to be the one-stop shop where financial institutions can manage their due diligence and KYC information, says Henseval, and then to share with their correspondent banks to reduce the bilateral exchanges taking place in the KYC space. Today, the Swift Registry has more than 5,500 banks registered and using the service.
Henseval says the standard it has today meets up to 90% of bank requirements, almost eliminating fully bilateral exchanges. Before, registry banks had to exchange questionnaires on a bilateral basis. She gives the example of a bank with 100 relationships, which would traditionally have had to exchange the same type of information100 times with all its different partners.
Looking Ahead
In the fourth quarter of this year, Swift plans to extend its KYC Registry to Swift-connected corporations, enabling them to upload and maintain their information to the registry, and to share it with banks who will be able to use it for their corporate KYC activities.
Next year, Swift plans to introduce what it calls a “proactive API”. “The API offered by the KYC Registry is, at the moment, ‘reactive,’” says Henseval. “This means that the customer has to initiate the call and request data via API. In 2020, we intend to offer a proactive API, which will proactively push new or updated KYC data to customers. This will ensure our customers always use the latest KYC profile that has been made available by their correspondents, without the need to manually check if new data is available.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.