Synechron Aims to Normalize ESG Ratings
The company is launching a new workbench in Q4, along with other prototypes and new accelerators.
As sustainable and well-intentioned as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing is playing out to be, it can be a convoluted and messy space for investment firms to navigate. The quality of ESG data remains a challenge as disclosures are often inconsistent and not standardized. Also, ESG rating providers such as MSCI, Refinitiv, Sustainalytics, and Bloomberg—the latest to offer such ratings—differ in their methodologies and how they examine the same exact firms.
This sector suffers from a lack of standards in the data, says Sandeep Kumar, head of Synechron’s buy-side accelerator program.
“When, let’s say, Refinitiv or MSCI says, ‘Hey this particular stock has an ESG score of 70’, and Sustainalytics says ‘Hey, this [same stock] has a score of 35’, there is no way to match these scores,” he says.
Investment firms are looking for standardization of ESG ratings, Kumar tells WatersTechnology, in the same way that credit ratings are now standardized, so firms understand what a “AAA rating” is, or what an “investment-grade bond” means.
“It doesn’t matter whether you go to Moody’s or S&P, you can relate to these [credit] ratings. But there is no such grading of ESG ratings yet in the industry,” he says.
To address this, some firms are building internal frameworks to better understand the impact of ESG factors on their portfolios. “Many firms, especially the big ones, have their own mechanisms of figuring out the ESG scores of companies—they don’t just rely on the ratings. Hedge funds like AQR do their own research, and have their own data engines and apply NLP on top of it to come up with their own scores,” he says.
For this reason, Synechron will be launching a new accelerator—its term for minimum viable prototypes showcasing the use of new technologies applied to a general use case—by the end of October, which aims to solve at least two specific problems within the ESG space: normalization of ESG ratings, and predicting returns of ESG investments.
The ESG workbench, which Synechron has been working on since May, will allow firms to bring in the ratings from the different rating providers and normalize the ratings looking at their past performance and how each provider calculates the “E”, “S”, and “G” scores. “By breaking this up, we are trying to combine and normalize these ratings and give a uniform view of these ratings,” Kumar says.
It hasn’t been easy, he adds.
“To give an example, Refinitiv has a positive rating, so, the higher the score, the higher the ESG rating, whereas Sustainalytics, they have it the other way around: If the ESG score is high, it means a lot of attention needs to be paid to this company’s environmental or social factors. So, a lower score means a higher ESG rating there,” he says. (For more on the technical components of the service, see “Technical Components” below.)
Another challenge is when there are new rating providers. Kumar says that more established players like MSCI, for example, have “perfected this and standardized how they have done it.” The newer entrants don’t have the historical ratings, “so there’s no way to test the ratings to show how firms have performed over the years. Just knowing the rating at a single point in time is not helpful,” he says.
Synechron is working with RavenPack, which provides stock-specific and macro sentiment analysis and scores. It is considering how it can combine RavenPack’s analysis into its tool.
Kumar says RavenPack has a “no human” approach in how it analyzes companies. Instead, it uses machine-learning algorithms and NLP. “The reason they do that is they don’t want to bring subjectivity in saying ‘Tesla is good’. They want to scan news articles, company filings, supply chains, and other factors and then come up with a rating,” he says.
ESG = Better Returns?
Then comes the second problem Synechron looks to solve. Does investing in ESG result in better returns, and can ESG scores predict a portfolio’s performance?
Early ESG investors may have pushed forward with their investments even though they were getting returns 1% lower than regular funds because they believe in the sustainability factors and “it’s the right way to do it”.
“But as more investors have gone into ESG, those returns have gone away,” Kumar says. “There is research that shows that just because you are investing in [companies with good ESG scores], it will not give you better returns. It will take some time to figure out how to relate an investment performance with ESG.”
In the Cloud
Separately, since partnering with Google Cloud in June, Synechron has been working to bring two new prototypes on the Google Cloud platform. The prototypes have been developed using open-source technology and machine learning, says Anand Chandra, senior director at Synechron.
The first is an extension of Liquify, a Treasury-as-a-Service API solution already developed by Synechron that gives banks’ customers access to FX cash management, hedging, liquidity management, daily cash management, and other cash investment products. ”We are working on two key prototypes, which build on cloud functionality. One of them is Liquify 2.0. We are going to extend the Liquify platform to include cash forecasting,” Chandra says.
The Liquify model has an overnight algorithm called “cash sweeping” to look for end-of-day balances. This will be extended to include cash forecasting, tapping on Synechron’s AI platform—Neo—which comprises NLP, chatbots, robotic process automation (RPA), cognitive machine learning, data science, and robo-advisor accelerators. “The portal will leverage native AI and the analytics capabilities of the Google Cloud platform, with the end solution being a hybrid cloud product, built on foundations of open banking,” Chandra says.
The second prototype, a hybrid cloud-hosted framework, is an ESG trade enabler that integrates emerging asset classes on to a buy-side firm’s existing technology infrastructure.
“One particular challenge for the buy side is that they might not have the technology to fully integrate new asset classes,” he says.
Chandra says the two new products show how Synechron can work with Google Cloud capabilities. Synechron has around 150 engineers who have gone through the Google Cloud platform training and are working on how to leverage it for clients. “Our next focus is to invest in the capability build out across different locations,” Chandra says.
Technical Considerations
Synechron had three technical considerations in building the ESG workbench. The tool needed to have an easy deployment, good usability, and have data science methodologies incorporated within it.
“We are building it to be API-based because we understand that by the time we launch this, there could be another rating provider coming in. For example, we had already started work on the tool when Bloomberg announced it will start offering ESG ratings. This way, firms can easily pump in ratings into their workbench. It has a versatile data-engine layer, so they can add ratings from many vendors,” Kumar says.
Then, the workbench needed to have a configurable user interface, to allow clients to drill down into a specific portfolio or a particular stock.
The last technical stack was to apply data science methods to predict the performance of a portfolio linked to ESG ratings. To do this, Synechron applied clustering and neural networks, Kumar says. It also has an NLP processor that can scan different documents and derive an ESG sentiment score based on the content.
“Let’s take the ‘G’ as an example. Suppose a firm has a board membership of 20 people. Now they are looking at the board’s diversity like how many different nationalities are represented, or is there women representation in the board? When companies make changes to the board, it is buried in their 10-K reports or in their quarterly transcripts,” Kumar says. “So, our engine can allow such documents to be pulled into the system, and it will scan it and tell you, ‘By looking at this your ‘G ‘score is likely to go up, because we have found more women or a member with a different background joining the board now’.”
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.