Telerate Buys Canada's CMQ For US $75 Million, Blocking Thomson Bid And Adding Equities To Arsenal
THIS MONTH'S LEAD STORIES
As expected, Telerate, Inc. has acquired Toronto-based quote vendor CMQ Communications Inc. (MTR, October 1987). The purchase price was US$75 million. While both firms crow about strategic fit, Telerate's underlying motives for the deal were more defensive than offensive, and the company now seems a bit perplexed about exactly what to do with its new possession.
"Obviously the significant strategic motivation" for the deal, says Telerate vice president and general counsel Steven Rappaport, is that "it expands the products we can offer on a worldwide basis." Obvious as that may be, however, the real motivation of Telerate -- and most likely of its 56-percent owner Dow Jones & Co. -- was to keep CMQ out of the hands of International Thomson Organization, Ltd. (MTR, July 1987)
Although CMQ's 10,000+ screens make it Canada's largest quote vendor, and although its technology is well-regarded, CMQ found itself a pawn in a much larger game involving giant international information publishers and markets. Its principal asset, from the standpoint of Thomson and Dow Jones, wasn't its user base or its technology, but its unique agreement for redistribution of Telerate data in the U.S. and elsewhere (MTR, May 1986).
Given what Dow Jones has paid for Telerate shares lately (MTR, October 1987), it was unconscionable to let broad rights to the same database fall into competitive hands for a pittance. Thomson bid C$100 million for CMQ contingent upon the Telerate deal remaining intact. Telerate, it appears, found that the only way to bust up the deal was to buy the company outright at an equivalent price.
But however defensive its motivation, Telerate does achieve certain benefits. For one thing, it gets back another piece of its foreign distribution. CMQ has exclusive Canadian rights to sell Telerate service until the mid-1990s, and Rappaport says Telerate sales account for more than half of CMQ's profits. The company had US$18.9 million in sales in 1986 and forecasts US$27 million for 1987. Telerate also gets an operational North American exchange ticker plant and workstation technology that allows exchange data to be substituted for scrolling news at the bottom of a Telerate page.
LONDON SOON
This hybrid equities/fixed-income service is in use by 35-40 percent of CMQ's U.S. customers, says CEO Henry Becher, and will be the lead product for rolling out CMQ's service beyond North America. A London operation will be established "in short order" to serve Europe, he says. CMQ's North American operations probably will remain status quo for the foreseeable future, but overseas efforts will be handled directly by Telerate. "Outside North America Telerate is in a much better position to take what we've got and integrate it with theirs," he says.
Telerate's Rappaport is bullish on the prospects for selling North American equities data to fixed-income and foreign exchange traders, particularly at smaller customers overseas where the same trader may be dealing in more than one market. Nonetheless, it's an uphill climb. Although the total number of quote terminals outside North America is roughly the same as the number in North America, 80 percent of the screens showing NYSE last sale prices are in the U.S. and Canada.
One of the grander ironies of the CMQ acquisition is that Dow Jones for the first time finds itself the majority owner of a flesh-and-blood equities quote vendor. This is a field it has eschewed for decades, but probably could have dominated had it decided to get in during the early days of the 1960s.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.