Need to know
On May 6, 2010, the Flash Crash occurred.
On May 26, 2010, the SEC held its first open meeting proposing a rule to build the CAT.
On January 17, 2017, the SROs selected Thesys to build the CAT.
In November 2017, the SROs will begin submitting data to the CAT.
Thesys Technologies announced that the next step in building the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) has been achieved, as the technology subsidiary of Tradeworx signed the contract with the self-regulatory organizations (SROs) to build the platform that will manage the tracking and auditing of all stocks and options transactions by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
In January, the consortium of SROs tapped Thesys to build and replace legacy reporting systems, including the Order Audit Trail System (Oats), which was built by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) and was thought to be the favorite to win the CAT bid.
In what came as something of a surprise, Thesys edged out Finra for a couple reasons, including what would happen should there be a cyberattack. In a feature detailing how Thesys won the bid, several sources told Waters that Finra’s unwillingness to take on all liability in case of a potential breach of the CAT database was a non-negotiable point for the SROs. Thesys has long been a vocal proponent of the importance of the CAT’s cybersecurity defenses.
“Security was a key element of the Thesys CAT bid—designed from the ground up and deeply integrated into the architecture,” Anshul Anand, senior vice president of business development for Thesys Technologies, tells Waters. “Through the bid process, we continued to innovate on security features related to advanced encryption and access management. We convened a panel of world-renowned security experts to help design and vet these security concepts.”
To act as the CAT plan processor, Thesys established Thesys CAT LLC as a separate legal entity. Thesys CAT is partnering with IBM, which will provide hosting on the IBM Cloud, cognitive computing and security services, technology infrastructure, program management, consulting and help desk services. [For more on IBM’s involvement in the project, click here.]
Latham & Watkins is serving as legal counsel to Thesys CAT. The SROs, on the other hand, jointly formed CAT NMS LLC to oversee the build and operations of the CAT system.
Next Steps
Anand says that the company has “a number of internal work streams” looking at the technology, itself, as well as for operations and security.
“We’re happy to have the contract with the SROs in place. Throughout the past few months since we won the bid back in January, we’ve been working on planning and delivering the CAT system,” he says. “We are currently focused on the execution timeline outlined in the CAT NMS Plan—as part of the recent Industry Outreach Webex hosted by the SROs, they shared a few of the important next steps, including publication of technical specifications and billing. Simultaneously we have been building a strong Thesys CAT bench under an exceptional management team, which we’ll be providing further details on in the near future.”
In November, SROs will begin submitting data to the CAT. Starting in January 2018, SROs will begin implementing enhanced surveillance based on CAT data. And in November 2018, large broker-dealers will begin submitting data to the CAT.
The First Bill
According to a recent Finra rule filing, the CAT will cost the industry $50.7 million for the current fiscal year, which began on Nov. 21, 2016. Of that cost, $37.5 million will be used for operational development of the platform, while the remaining $13.2 million will cover third-party support costs, operational reserve and insurance costs.
To spread out the costs, industry members—i.e., broker-dealers—will cover 75 percent of the cost using a tiered structure depending on how much message traffic they generate. Execution venues—including equity and options exchanges, as well as ATSes—will cover the other 25 percent, with equity exchanges taking 75 percent of that cost.
From the filing: “The Operating Committee determined that a 75/25 division between Equity and Options Execution Venues maintained elasticity across the funding model as well the greatest level of fee equitability and comparability based on the current number of Equity and Options Execution Venues.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.