To Help 'Phase 3' Firms Comply with Initial Margin Rules, AcadiaSoft Releases Open-Source Code
Next September, Phase 3 firms will be required to post initial margin for all non-cleared derivatives transactions.
Starting on September 1, 2018, so-called Phase 3 firms—which include mid-tier regional banks, asset managers and fund administrators—will have to post initial margin for all non-cleared derivatives transactions to comply with International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) guidelines. Phase 1 and 2 firms are already adhering to it as of September 2016 and ’17, respectively.
The ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) is designed to create a standard methodology for calculating initial margin that could also meet requirements of the regulatory framework set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).
The code, which is available on GitHub, will be updated on a regular basis to make sure that users are always on the latest version of the ISDA SIMM code. Users of the code will still have to first obtain a license from ISDA for production use of SIMM and US-based firms will need approval from their lead prudential regulator.
Mark Demo, product director at AcadiaSoft, says that while Phase 1 and 2 firms tend to be big global dealers or large regional dealers with hefty budgets and teams of quants on staff, Phase 3 firms are a mix of organizations that will have their own unique challenges.
Firms with limited resources will have to figure out how they will perform the calculations—in-house or through a third party. These guidelines, Demo says, will require firms to calculate sensitives on these trades, map those sensitivities to the standard risk buckets that SIMM requires, and then quants on staff must continually monitor the firm’s SIMM calculation versus its 10-day moving P&L average to make sure the firm is adhering to the rule’s 10-day 99 percent confidence level risk standard.
“That’s a big commitment,” Demo says. “What we’re learning with Phase 1’s and 2’s and how they’ve done it, versus 3’s, 4’s and 5’s, is that it’s going to be a little different because they’re firms with different levels of technical capability.”
In addition to open-sourcing its SIMM code, AcadiaSoft is also piloting a sensitivity calculation offering and an ISDA SIMM back-testing service. The sensitivity calculations are expected to be issued in Q1 2018, with the back-testing piece coming in Q2 2018. These services will be available to firms of all sizes, and are not exclusive to Phase 3. In fact, Demo says that Q1 firms are currently the ones piloting the back-testing service.
Demo says that by releasing this open-source offering to the public, it will hopefully help to bring in Phase 3–5 companies to try out the AcadiaSoft Expert Services, which includes an ISDA SIMM Approval Guidance service, and then try out the sensitivity calculations and back-testing once they are available.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.