UTIs, Pre-LEIs Are Top Concerns as EMIR Reporting Begins
Requirements to report unique trade identifiers (UTIs) and pre-legal entity identifiers (pre-LEI) are expected to cause the most significant challenges, particularly for smaller financial institutions, as European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) reporting requirements come into effect for derivatives trades in Europe on February 12.
UTIs and pre-LEIs are among a series of attributes that will have to be reported for all exchange-traded derivatives, over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and foreign-exchange forwards, when an entity trades either directly with a European Union (EU) counterparty or in EU products.
UTIs are the greatest cause for concern because the European Securities and Markets Authority has not been prescriptive about the form these should take or who should report them.
Emily Cates, London-based operational processing specialist at Rule Financial consultancy, says when the Dodd-Frank Act introduced similar trade reporting requirements in the US, regulators were very specific about the identifier that should be used. However, in Europe, there is less certainty about who should produce and report UTIs, and how they should be disseminated.
Cates says some market participants have tried to model their UTIs on the Unique Swap Identifiers they are already using in the US, but have experienced trouble distributing these because they include semi colons, underscores and slashes, which are incompatible with some commonly-used communication channels.
Darren Marsh, London-based senior product manager at data vendor SIX Financial Information, says the situation is also complicated by the fact that only an interim taxonomy is available for the UTI at the moment and this will be replaced with a permanent taxonomy when it has been finalized.
There have been significant increases in the numbers of entities registering for pre-LEIs in recent weeks, but Cates and Marsh both believe many of the entities that will be affected by EMIR are yet to apply for pre-LEIs.
"The biggest challenge around the pre-LEI is getting them registered for your clients," says Marsh. "Market awareness of the need for pre-LEIs probably hasn't been as high as it could have been, but that is primarily because a lot of organizations are affected that wouldn't necessarily have visibility of these kinds of issues. So really the onus is on organizations to do outreach work. They have been doing a lot of outreach, but there is only so much you can do within a constrained timeframe."
Like many industry participants, Cates believes smaller financial firms will struggle the most to comply with EMIR reporting requirements. "Some of the major financial institutions that have very large portfolios have been putting a lot of resources into this for quite some time," she says. "So there will be a shake-out period, but they will fall into line. The ones that are struggling more are the smaller players, the ones who maybe only do a few of these types of trades. There has been a lot of confusion over what should be reported and what shouldn't be."
More information on the challenges of managing UTIs can be found here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
Regulators recommend Figi over Cusip, Isin for reporting in FDTA proposal
Another contentious battle in the world of identifiers pits the Figi against Cusip and the Isin, with regulators including the Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC so far backing the Figi.
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.